Measuring AI literacy in medical students: scale development and validation within a self-determination theory framework

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare, making AI literacy an essential competency for medical students. Existing assessments are often generic, lack validation in medical education, and are not grounded in learning theory. This study developed and validated the AI Literacy Scale for Medical Students (ALSMS) within a self-determination theory (SDT) framework. METHODS: = 314). Candidate facets were derived from prior AI literacy instruments and a previously developed framework, then organized according to SDT. EFA refined the first-order structure, and CFA cross-validated the retained structure and compared prespecified first-order and SDT-aligned higher-order models. RESULTS: . Unidimensional and some hierarchical general-factor models showed poorer fit or identification problems, supporting the construct's multidimensionality. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial validity evidence for interpreting ALSMS scores as indicators of medical students' AI literacy within an SDT-informed framework. The findings highlight the significance of integrating ethics into autonomy-supportive curricula and underscore the potential utility of ALSMS for curriculum design, advising, and the evaluation of AI literacy initiatives in medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Education Online
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2675066
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring AI literacy in medical students: scale development and validation within a self-determination theory framework

Pei-Jan Tsai, Ching Sing Chai, Hung‐Che Lin, Chin-Sheng Lin et al.
Medical Education Online
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Measuring AI literacy in medical students: scale development and validation within a self-determination theory framework

Pei-Jan Tsai, Ching Sing Chai, Hung‐Che Lin, Chin-Sheng Lin, Chin Lin, Jyh-Chong Liang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare, making AI literacy an essential competency for medical students. Existing assessments are often generic, lack validation in medical education, and are not grounded in learning theory. This study developed and validated the AI Literacy Scale for Medical Students (ALSMS) within a self-determination theory (SDT) framework. METHODS: = 314). Candidate facets were derived from prior AI literacy instruments and a previously developed framework, then organized according to SDT. EFA refined the first-order structure, and CFA cross-validated the retained structure and compared prespecified first-order and SDT-aligned higher-order models. RESULTS: . Unidimensional and some hierarchical general-factor models showed poorer fit or identification problems, supporting the construct's multidimensionality. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial validity evidence for interpreting ALSMS scores as indicators of medical students' AI literacy within an SDT-informed framework. The findings highlight the significance of integrating ethics into autonomy-supportive curricula and underscore the potential utility of ALSMS for curriculum design, advising, and the evaluation of AI literacy initiatives in medical education.

Medical Education OnlineVol. 31(1)
National Taiwan Normal University (TW), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), National Defense Medical College (JP), National Defense Medical Center (TW)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.