A Strategic Decision-Making Model for Hydrogen Energy Technology Selection under Sustainability Criteria

In recent years, the transition towards alternative energy sources has accelerated due to global warming, carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. In this context, hydrogen energy emerges as one of the most prominent energy sources, with features such as near-zero carbon emissions, energy diversity, security of supply, storability, portability, producibility from renewable sources, and high energy density. Hydrogen energy can be derived from different sources using different methods. Because each method has its own merits and drawbacks, selecting the best hydrogen energy production method is a significant challenge for decision-makers. The primary aim of this study is to develop a novel, robust, and integrated Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to identify the most suitable hydrogen production technology under economic, environmental, and socio-political sustainability criteria. While the FF - Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) is utilized to determine the weights of the main and sub-criteria in an environment of uncertainty, the FF-Additive Ratio Assessment System (ARTASI) is deployed to evaluate hydrogen production technologies. To analyze the robustness and validation of the suggested framework, sensitivity analyses were performed with respect to the criteria weights and the w and α parameters in the utility function, which can affect results, especially in the ARTASI method. According to the analysis results, Steam Methane Reforming was identified as the most suitable technology for hydrogen production in Türkiye due to its low cost, technological maturity, and compatibility with existing infrastructure. Coal gasification ranked second, while electrolysis and biomass gasification ranked third and fourth, respectively. These findings provide policymakers in Trkiye with valuable insights into its sustainable hydrogen strategy and demonstrate the practical applicability of Fermatean fuzzy MCDM methods in complex energy decision-making processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622026500598
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Strategic Decision-Making Model for Hydrogen Energy Technology Selection under Sustainability Criteria

Berk Ayvaz, Ayse Nur Sagin, Nezir Aydin
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
article

A Strategic Decision-Making Model for Hydrogen Energy Technology Selection under Sustainability Criteria

Berk Ayvaz, Ayse Nur Sagin, Nezir Aydin
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the transition towards alternative energy sources has accelerated due to global warming, carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. In this context, hydrogen energy emerges as one of the most prominent energy sources, with features such as near-zero carbon emissions, energy diversity, security of supply, storability, portability, producibility from renewable sources, and high energy density. Hydrogen energy can be derived from different sources using different methods. Because each method has its own merits and drawbacks, selecting the best hydrogen energy production method is a significant challenge for decision-makers. The primary aim of this study is to develop a novel, robust, and integrated Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to identify the most suitable hydrogen production technology under economic, environmental, and socio-political sustainability criteria. While the FF - Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) is utilized to determine the weights of the main and sub-criteria in an environment of uncertainty, the FF-Additive Ratio Assessment System (ARTASI) is deployed to evaluate hydrogen production technologies. To analyze the robustness and validation of the suggested framework, sensitivity analyses were performed with respect to the criteria weights and the w and α parameters in the utility function, which can affect results, especially in the ARTASI method. According to the analysis results, Steam Methane Reforming was identified as the most suitable technology for hydrogen production in Türkiye due to its low cost, technological maturity, and compatibility with existing infrastructure. Coal gasification ranked second, while electrolysis and biomass gasification ranked third and fourth, respectively. These findings provide policymakers in Trkiye with valuable insights into its sustainable hydrogen strategy and demonstrate the practical applicability of Fermatean fuzzy MCDM methods in complex energy decision-making processes.

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.