Probing the habitual and compulsive-like basis of (dys)functional checking in the Observing Response Task, a rodent analogue relevant to obsessive-compulsive disorder

RATIONALE: Excessive and maladaptive checking is a prominent symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This dysfunctional checking can be modelled using the Observing Response Task (ORT), which distinguishes between functional and dysfunctional checking shown by the same individuals, in rodents and humans. We have previously observed that rats classified as sign-trackers on a pavlovian autoshaping procedure show elevated levels of dysfunctional checking. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether dysfunctional checking was habitual and compulsive. METHODS: 119 Lister Hooded rats (M = 95, F = 24) were classified using pavlovian autoshaping and concurrently underwent ORT training. Briefly, rats learned to respond on one of two levers to receive reinforcement, with the correct lever changing unpredictably throughout the session. Pressing a third, 'observing' lever illuminated a light cue over the currently correct lever. These functional Observing Lever Presses (OLPs) can be distinguished from dysfunctional Extra Observing Lever Presses (eOLPs), which have no programmed consequences. Whether dysfunctional checking was habitual was examined by degrading the contingency between checking and light cue presentation, and whether it was compulsive was determined by punishing 50% of checking responses. RESULTS: Sign-trackers showed higher levels of dysfunctional checking than goal-trackers and intermediates, including after contingency degradation. Punished checking eradicated checking behaviour in most rats, but a minority of sign-trackers persisted despite punishment via shock. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that sign-trackers exhibit more cue-driven checking behaviour than goal-trackers. Observations from punished checking refer to the prevalence of severe OCD in the human population concerning persistence of pathological checking despite aversive consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychopharmacology
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-026-07094-9
Primary Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probing the habitual and compulsive-like basis of (dys)functional checking in the Observing Response Task, a rodent analogue relevant to obsessive-compulsive disorder

Amy Milton, Luise Pickenhan
Psychopharmacology
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
article

Probing the habitual and compulsive-like basis of (dys)functional checking in the Observing Response Task, a rodent analogue relevant to obsessive-compulsive disorder

Amy Milton, Luise Pickenhan
article en

Abstract

RATIONALE: Excessive and maladaptive checking is a prominent symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This dysfunctional checking can be modelled using the Observing Response Task (ORT), which distinguishes between functional and dysfunctional checking shown by the same individuals, in rodents and humans. We have previously observed that rats classified as sign-trackers on a pavlovian autoshaping procedure show elevated levels of dysfunctional checking. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether dysfunctional checking was habitual and compulsive. METHODS: 119 Lister Hooded rats (M = 95, F = 24) were classified using pavlovian autoshaping and concurrently underwent ORT training. Briefly, rats learned to respond on one of two levers to receive reinforcement, with the correct lever changing unpredictably throughout the session. Pressing a third, 'observing' lever illuminated a light cue over the currently correct lever. These functional Observing Lever Presses (OLPs) can be distinguished from dysfunctional Extra Observing Lever Presses (eOLPs), which have no programmed consequences. Whether dysfunctional checking was habitual was examined by degrading the contingency between checking and light cue presentation, and whether it was compulsive was determined by punishing 50% of checking responses. RESULTS: Sign-trackers showed higher levels of dysfunctional checking than goal-trackers and intermediates, including after contingency degradation. Punished checking eradicated checking behaviour in most rats, but a minority of sign-trackers persisted despite punishment via shock. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that sign-trackers exhibit more cue-driven checking behaviour than goal-trackers. Observations from punished checking refer to the prevalence of severe OCD in the human population concerning persistence of pathological checking despite aversive consequences.

Psychopharmacology
University of Cambridge (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.