Entrustable Professional Activities for Head and Neck Surgery Residents: A Consensus Model

OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized set of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for Head and Neck Surgery residency training through expert consensus. DESIGN: Consensus-based study using a modified Delphi methodology conducted over two rounds, with a priori agreement threshold of 85% for inclusion. SETTING: Academic and tertiary referral institutions involved in Head and Neck Surgery residency training in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Eight expert Head and Neck Surgeons with extensive experience in residency education, academic leadership, and professional society participation. All invited panelists who entered the study completed this modified Delphi process. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 18 EPAs specific to Head and Neck Surgery residency. Each EPA was mapped to core surgical competencies and stratified across five entrustment levels, ranging from observation but no execution, even with direct supervision (Level 1) to capable of independent practice and supervising others (Level 5). CONCLUSIONS: This study established a consensus-based EPA framework for Head and Neck Surgery residency education. The proposed EPAs support competency-based assessment, progressive entrustment, and enhanced educational accountability, with potential to improve resident evaluation and patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of surgical education
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.103983
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entrustable Professional Activities for Head and Neck Surgery Residents: A Consensus Model

Ricardo Ribeiro Gama, Marco Aurélio Vamondes Kulcsar, Fátima Cristina Mendes de Matos, Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis et al.
Journal of surgical education
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Entrustable Professional Activities for Head and Neck Surgery Residents: A Consensus Model

Ricardo Ribeiro Gama, Marco Aurélio Vamondes Kulcsar, Fátima Cristina Mendes de Matos, Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis, Mario Augusto Ferrari de Castro, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Bruno Pelinson Fogaça Duarte, Pedro Cesar Moraes Silveira, Flavio Carneiro Hojaij, Jose Guilheme Vartanian
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized set of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for Head and Neck Surgery residency training through expert consensus. DESIGN: Consensus-based study using a modified Delphi methodology conducted over two rounds, with a priori agreement threshold of 85% for inclusion. SETTING: Academic and tertiary referral institutions involved in Head and Neck Surgery residency training in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Eight expert Head and Neck Surgeons with extensive experience in residency education, academic leadership, and professional society participation. All invited panelists who entered the study completed this modified Delphi process. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 18 EPAs specific to Head and Neck Surgery residency. Each EPA was mapped to core surgical competencies and stratified across five entrustment levels, ranging from observation but no execution, even with direct supervision (Level 1) to capable of independent practice and supervising others (Level 5). CONCLUSIONS: This study established a consensus-based EPA framework for Head and Neck Surgery residency education. The proposed EPAs support competency-based assessment, progressive entrustment, and enhanced educational accountability, with potential to improve resident evaluation and patient safety.

Journal of surgical educationVol. 83(8)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço (BR), Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR), Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (BR), Universidade de Pernambuco (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.