Micro- and Nanoplastics in Agricultural Crop Systems: From Environmental Particles to Plant Phenotypes and Food-System Relevance

Micro- and nanoplastics (MPs/NPs) are increasingly recognized as persistent contaminants in agricultural systems, where repeated inputs from mulch films, biosolids, composts, irrigation water, and atmospheric deposition create sustained exposure pathways for crops. Although various studies report effects on crop growth and physiology, mechanistic interpretation remains limited because outcomes vary widely across experiments and are often discussed without appropriate attention to exposure context, particle properties, and evidentiary strength. This review advances an agroecosystem-centered, evidence-aware framework for interpreting how MPs/NPs influence crops from environmental entry to plant phenotype. We argue that crop responses cannot be inferred from polymer identity alone, but must be interpreted through the interacting effects of particle size, morphology, surface chemistry, weathering state, aggregation behavior, co-contaminant associations, and exposure matrix. Within this framework, crop responses are organized along a mechanistic chain linking environmental entry and plant contact, interface behavior at root and leaf surfaces, conditional barrier crossing and transport, ROS-centered stress signaling with hormonal and ionic regulation, and downstream effects on germination, root function, photosynthesis, biomass, productivity, and quality-related traits. Particular emphasis is placed on distinguishing surface association, supported internalization, and supported systemic translocation, because these categories carry distinct implications for edible-tissue occurrence, crop quality, and food-system relevance. Current evidence suggests that the soil–plant–food pathway is plausible and increasingly supported, but its interpretation remains constrained by uneven analytical rigor and limited field realism. Future progress will require realistic agricultural exposure designs, stronger polymer-specific confirmation, and closer integration of mechanistic evidence with agronomic and food-system endpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15111594
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Micro- and Nanoplastics in Agricultural Crop Systems: From Environmental Particles to Plant Phenotypes and Food-System Relevance

Muhammad Ajmal Bashir, Maryam Noor, Amina Qamar, Laiba Bibi et al.
Plants
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Micro- and Nanoplastics in Agricultural Crop Systems: From Environmental Particles to Plant Phenotypes and Food-System Relevance

Muhammad Ajmal Bashir, Maryam Noor, Amina Qamar, Laiba Bibi, Muhammad Tanveer Akhtar, Muhammad Zubair, Abdul Karim
article en

Abstract

Micro- and nanoplastics (MPs/NPs) are increasingly recognized as persistent contaminants in agricultural systems, where repeated inputs from mulch films, biosolids, composts, irrigation water, and atmospheric deposition create sustained exposure pathways for crops. Although various studies report effects on crop growth and physiology, mechanistic interpretation remains limited because outcomes vary widely across experiments and are often discussed without appropriate attention to exposure context, particle properties, and evidentiary strength. This review advances an agroecosystem-centered, evidence-aware framework for interpreting how MPs/NPs influence crops from environmental entry to plant phenotype. We argue that crop responses cannot be inferred from polymer identity alone, but must be interpreted through the interacting effects of particle size, morphology, surface chemistry, weathering state, aggregation behavior, co-contaminant associations, and exposure matrix. Within this framework, crop responses are organized along a mechanistic chain linking environmental entry and plant contact, interface behavior at root and leaf surfaces, conditional barrier crossing and transport, ROS-centered stress signaling with hormonal and ionic regulation, and downstream effects on germination, root function, photosynthesis, biomass, productivity, and quality-related traits. Particular emphasis is placed on distinguishing surface association, supported internalization, and supported systemic translocation, because these categories carry distinct implications for edible-tissue occurrence, crop quality, and food-system relevance. Current evidence suggests that the soil–plant–food pathway is plausible and increasingly supported, but its interpretation remains constrained by uneven analytical rigor and limited field realism. Future progress will require realistic agricultural exposure designs, stronger polymer-specific confirmation, and closer integration of mechanistic evidence with agronomic and food-system endpoints.

PlantsVol. 15(11)
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), University of Swat (PK), Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.