Elucidating Lithium Transport Mechanisms in Disordered LiF from Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Lithium fluoride (LiF) is a ubiquitous component of solid- and cathode–electrolyte interphases, yet its functional role remains unclear under the structural and chemical heterogeneity typical of cycling batteries. Here, we systematically quantify how structural disorder, off-stoichiometry, and strain govern Li-ion transport in LiF. Using a machine-learning potential to enable extensive molecular-dynamics sampling, we compare crystalline and amorphous LiF, Li0.95F, and LiF0.95, and evaluate the impact of small homogeneous deformations. Defect-free crystalline LiF is effectively ion-blocking at 300−500 K, whereas amorphization generates free-volume–assisted percolation pathways that facilitates Li-ion diffusion. At elevated temperatures, thermodynamically driven crystallization disrupts these pathways, leading to non-Arrhenius behavior. In crystalline phases, Li deficiency activates vacancy-mediated diffusion, while in amorphous LiF, transport is governed primarily by network connectivity. Strain is found to have only a marginal effect on Li mobility in both crystalline and amorphous structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Materials Letters
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.6c00029
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elucidating Lithium Transport Mechanisms in Disordered LiF from Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Nicole Adelstein, Nikhil Rampal, 袁苏跃, Liwen F. Wan
ACS Materials Letters
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Elucidating Lithium Transport Mechanisms in Disordered LiF from Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Nicole Adelstein, Nikhil Rampal, 袁苏跃, Liwen F. Wan
article en

Abstract

Lithium fluoride (LiF) is a ubiquitous component of solid- and cathode–electrolyte interphases, yet its functional role remains unclear under the structural and chemical heterogeneity typical of cycling batteries. Here, we systematically quantify how structural disorder, off-stoichiometry, and strain govern Li-ion transport in LiF. Using a machine-learning potential to enable extensive molecular-dynamics sampling, we compare crystalline and amorphous LiF, Li0.95F, and LiF0.95, and evaluate the impact of small homogeneous deformations. Defect-free crystalline LiF is effectively ion-blocking at 300−500 K, whereas amorphization generates free-volume–assisted percolation pathways that facilitates Li-ion diffusion. At elevated temperatures, thermodynamically driven crystallization disrupts these pathways, leading to non-Arrhenius behavior. In crystalline phases, Li deficiency activates vacancy-mediated diffusion, while in amorphous LiF, transport is governed primarily by network connectivity. Strain is found to have only a marginal effect on Li mobility in both crystalline and amorphous structures.

ACS Materials Letters
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), San Francisco State University (US)
Vehicle Technologies Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.