Using LLMs as sentiment analyzers to predict review helpfulness: first insights to open the black box

Abstract This study examines the potential of large language models for sentiment analysis in marketing. Using the empirical setting of online customer reviews, we further explore implications for prediction of review helpfulness. Relying on a dataset of 28,900 product reviews from a consumer platform and an experiment with N = 1063 participants, we find that the LLM’s accuracy in assessing intended meaning (as in the star-rating) in customer-written text depends on the degree of emotionality, as in purchases of hedonic (vs. utilitarian) goods. We further demonstrate that deviations between LLM classification and original star rating predict lower review helpfulness. This effect is mediated by the deviation of human readers’ assumption on the intended star rating from the actual star rating and moderated by the degree of information asymmetry before the purchase; that is, a greater deviation between the LLM classification and the original star rating indicates lower review helpfulness for search goods than for experience goods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marketing Letters
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-026-09824-7
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using LLMs as sentiment analyzers to predict review helpfulness: first insights to open the black box

Mattis Hartwig, Christian Winter, Nicolas A. Zacharias
Marketing Letters
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Using LLMs as sentiment analyzers to predict review helpfulness: first insights to open the black box

Mattis Hartwig, Christian Winter, Nicolas A. Zacharias
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the potential of large language models for sentiment analysis in marketing. Using the empirical setting of online customer reviews, we further explore implications for prediction of review helpfulness. Relying on a dataset of 28,900 product reviews from a consumer platform and an experiment with N = 1063 participants, we find that the LLM’s accuracy in assessing intended meaning (as in the star-rating) in customer-written text depends on the degree of emotionality, as in purchases of hedonic (vs. utilitarian) goods. We further demonstrate that deviations between LLM classification and original star rating predict lower review helpfulness. This effect is mediated by the deviation of human readers’ assumption on the intended star rating from the actual star rating and moderated by the degree of information asymmetry before the purchase; that is, a greater deviation between the LLM classification and the original star rating indicates lower review helpfulness for search goods than for experience goods.

Marketing LettersVol. 37(1)
Deutsches Forschungsnetz (DE), Singularity University (US), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.