Non-Contact IOP Estimation Based on Corneal Stress Birefringence: Experimental and Computational Validation

Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) assessment is essential for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Conventional contact tonometry (e.g., Goldmann and rebound devices) remains widely used, but its accuracy is affected by operator dependence, alignment errors, and patient discomfort. We present a non-contact IOP estimation framework based on corneal stress birefringence and full-field fringe inversion. Ex vivo porcine corneas were imaged under controlled pressure loading from 15 to 20 mmHg, and a coupled stress-optic/shell mechanics model was used to generate pressure-indexed synthetic fringe fields for inverse fitting. In the 15–18 mmHg range, more than 75% of the estimates were within plus or minus 1 mmHg of the reference pressure; performance declined at 19–20 mmHg, consistent with a stronger nonlinear biomechanical response and reduced fringe separability. Defect experiments further showed that local stiffness loss caused both near-defect distortion and far-field stress redistribution, supporting the need for full-field rather than point-wise analysis. These results indicate that stress-birefringence imaging is a promising route toward non-contact, region-sensitive IOP assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113289
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Contact IOP Estimation Based on Corneal Stress Birefringence: Experimental and Computational Validation

Yv Zhang, Zhenhua Guo, Haoyuan Li, Yinda Li
Sensors
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Non-Contact IOP Estimation Based on Corneal Stress Birefringence: Experimental and Computational Validation

Yv Zhang, Zhenhua Guo, Haoyuan Li, Yinda Li
article en

Abstract

Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) assessment is essential for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Conventional contact tonometry (e.g., Goldmann and rebound devices) remains widely used, but its accuracy is affected by operator dependence, alignment errors, and patient discomfort. We present a non-contact IOP estimation framework based on corneal stress birefringence and full-field fringe inversion. Ex vivo porcine corneas were imaged under controlled pressure loading from 15 to 20 mmHg, and a coupled stress-optic/shell mechanics model was used to generate pressure-indexed synthetic fringe fields for inverse fitting. In the 15–18 mmHg range, more than 75% of the estimates were within plus or minus 1 mmHg of the reference pressure; performance declined at 19–20 mmHg, consistent with a stronger nonlinear biomechanical response and reduced fringe separability. Defect experiments further showed that local stiffness loss caused both near-defect distortion and far-field stress redistribution, supporting the need for full-field rather than point-wise analysis. These results indicate that stress-birefringence imaging is a promising route toward non-contact, region-sensitive IOP assessment.

SensorsVol. 26(11)
Hebei University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.