Who should vote? Membership and claims to expatriate political participation in the Nigerian diaspora

While no longer present in their home state, emigrants generally retain political membership; but should they retain all the rights and privileges? A key question is emigrants’ right to political participation in their country of origin – the right to vote and the right to run for political office. While previous research has examined the normative implications and factors contributing to the spread of expatriate voting rights, less is known about the opinions of emigrants who would gain the franchise and those who did not migrate. Using a unique survey of the Nigerian diaspora in 11 countries around the world and a sample of “Nigerians at Home,” we find that, counterintuitively, those “at home” generally support expatriate political participation more than the emigrants themselves. Our analysis further suggests that a strong belief in a territorially unbounded global diaspora population is one important source of this support. Absence from the territory elicits contradictory reactions: for those abroad it weakens claims to participation, at the same time those in Nigeria that see free speech under attack see the diaspora as a voice that can speak on their behalf.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Migration Studies
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-026-00546-3
Primary Topic
Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who should vote? Membership and claims to expatriate political participation in the Nigerian diaspora

Aaron Erlich, Thomas Soehl
Comparative Migration Studies
Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
article

Who should vote? Membership and claims to expatriate political participation in the Nigerian diaspora

Aaron Erlich, Thomas Soehl
article en

Abstract

While no longer present in their home state, emigrants generally retain political membership; but should they retain all the rights and privileges? A key question is emigrants’ right to political participation in their country of origin – the right to vote and the right to run for political office. While previous research has examined the normative implications and factors contributing to the spread of expatriate voting rights, less is known about the opinions of emigrants who would gain the franchise and those who did not migrate. Using a unique survey of the Nigerian diaspora in 11 countries around the world and a sample of “Nigerians at Home,” we find that, counterintuitively, those “at home” generally support expatriate political participation more than the emigrants themselves. Our analysis further suggests that a strong belief in a territorially unbounded global diaspora population is one important source of this support. Absence from the territory elicits contradictory reactions: for those abroad it weakens claims to participation, at the same time those in Nigeria that see free speech under attack see the diaspora as a voice that can speak on their behalf.

Comparative Migration Studies
McGill University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.