Disparities in access to optimal glioma care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Disparities in neuro-oncologic care are increasingly recognized, but their cumulative impact across the glioma treatment continuum remains unclear. Prior studies have largely examined isolated aspects of care without integrating access, treatment delivery, and survival outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and guidelines. Observational studies published between 2010 and 2025 examining socioeconomic, insurance-related, geographic, or health-system disparities in adult glioma were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Structural disadvantage is associated with reduced access to care, lower treatment intensity, and worse survival in adult glioma, underscoring the need for system-level interventions to address socioeconomic and geographic inequities. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420261277787.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Oncology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2026.2676789
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in access to optimal glioma care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tomasz Tykocki
Future Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Disparities in access to optimal glioma care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tomasz Tykocki
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparities in neuro-oncologic care are increasingly recognized, but their cumulative impact across the glioma treatment continuum remains unclear. Prior studies have largely examined isolated aspects of care without integrating access, treatment delivery, and survival outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and guidelines. Observational studies published between 2010 and 2025 examining socioeconomic, insurance-related, geographic, or health-system disparities in adult glioma were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Structural disadvantage is associated with reduced access to care, lower treatment intensity, and worse survival in adult glioma, underscoring the need for system-level interventions to address socioeconomic and geographic inequities. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420261277787.

Future Oncology
Uniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy (PL), Uczelnia Łazarskiego (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.