The meaning of prompts: a semiotic approach to human–machine communication

Purpose This paper aims to explore prompts and prompting in large language models (LLMs) as dynamic semiotic phenomena, reconceptualizing the practice from a technical input mechanism to a communicative and epistemic act that involves iterative sign formation, interpretation and refinement. Design/methodology/approach The theoretical foundation rests on Peirce's semiotics, utilizing the triadic model of signs (representamen, object, interpretant), his nine sign types and the Dynacom model of communication. Analytically, the LLM is positioned as a semiotic resource generating interpretants in response to user prompts to participate in meaning-making within a shared universe of discourse. Findings Prompting constitutes a semiotic and communicative process that redefines how knowledge is organized, searched, interpreted and co-constructed in digital environments. Originality/value This perspective invites a reimagination of the philosophical foundations of meaning, interpretation and epistemic agency in an age defined by human–machine communication and computational semiosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-03-2026-0140
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The meaning of prompts: a semiotic approach to human–machine communication

Bent Sørensen, Amalia Nurma Dewi, Martin Thellefsen
Journal of Documentation
Language and cultural evolution
article

The meaning of prompts: a semiotic approach to human–machine communication

Bent Sørensen, Amalia Nurma Dewi, Martin Thellefsen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore prompts and prompting in large language models (LLMs) as dynamic semiotic phenomena, reconceptualizing the practice from a technical input mechanism to a communicative and epistemic act that involves iterative sign formation, interpretation and refinement. Design/methodology/approach The theoretical foundation rests on Peirce's semiotics, utilizing the triadic model of signs (representamen, object, interpretant), his nine sign types and the Dynacom model of communication. Analytically, the LLM is positioned as a semiotic resource generating interpretants in response to user prompts to participate in meaning-making within a shared universe of discourse. Findings Prompting constitutes a semiotic and communicative process that redefines how knowledge is organized, searched, interpreted and co-constructed in digital environments. Originality/value This perspective invites a reimagination of the philosophical foundations of meaning, interpretation and epistemic agency in an age defined by human–machine communication and computational semiosis.

Journal of Documentation
State University of Malang (ID), University of Copenhagen (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK), Film Independent (US), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Language and cultural evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The meaning of prompts: a semiotic approach to human–machine communication — Bent Sørensen, Amalia Nurma Dewi, et al. · Journal of Documentation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS