Judgment of Ontology: Establishing New Standards for Thought —— Disenchantment of the Standards of Philosophy of Science, the Establishment of the Four-Dimensional Meta-Framework, and the Transcendence of Dao Meta-Theory

This paper systematically exposes a deep-rooted categorical error in contemporary philosophy: the misapplication of scientific standards—such as the principle of falsifiability and Occam's Razor—to the field of ontology. To remedy this, it establishes an independent Four-Dimensional Meta-Framework for ontological evaluation, comprising Accuracy of Problem Positioning, Self-Consistency of Methodology, Productivity of the System, and Termination Power over Predecessors' Predicaments. Applying this framework, the paper rigorously demonstrates that Dao Meta-Theory achieves systematic transcendence over Laozi, Plato, Kant, and Aristotle in terms of problem coverage, methodological purity, empirical verification, and the resolution of historical predicaments.