Parliamentary Oversight of Technology Regulation and the Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in India: A Constitutional Perspective

This paper examines how parliamentary oversight of technology regulation creates ethical responsibilities for engineers under the Indian Constitution. Parliament, through Standing Committees and legislation such as the IT Act 2000, Environment Protection Act 1986, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, defines the legal and ethical space within which engineers operate. Key constitutional provisions — particularly Articles 14, 21, 48A, and 51A — translate directly into professional ethical obligations that engineers must recognise and act upon. Using a systematic literature review and constitutional case analysis, this paper identifies four structural accountability gaps between parliamentary intent and engineering practice. It proposes the Constitutional- Ethical Accountability Framework (CEAF), a five- step decision model for engineers in safety- critical, environmental, and digital technology domains. Three concrete recommendations are offered for Parliament, engineering institutions, and individual practitioners. The findings are especially relevant to undergraduate engineering students at institutions like HKBK College of Engineering affiliated to VTU.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20340976
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parliamentary Oversight of Technology Regulation and the Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in India: A Constitutional Perspective

Khalid Ahmed, Prof. Sumaiya Banu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Parliamentary Oversight of Technology Regulation and the Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in India: A Constitutional Perspective

Khalid Ahmed, Prof. Sumaiya Banu
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how parliamentary oversight of technology regulation creates ethical responsibilities for engineers under the Indian Constitution. Parliament, through Standing Committees and legislation such as the IT Act 2000, Environment Protection Act 1986, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, defines the legal and ethical space within which engineers operate. Key constitutional provisions — particularly Articles 14, 21, 48A, and 51A — translate directly into professional ethical obligations that engineers must recognise and act upon. Using a systematic literature review and constitutional case analysis, this paper identifies four structural accountability gaps between parliamentary intent and engineering practice. It proposes the Constitutional- Ethical Accountability Framework (CEAF), a five- step decision model for engineers in safety- critical, environmental, and digital technology domains. Three concrete recommendations are offered for Parliament, engineering institutions, and individual practitioners. The findings are especially relevant to undergraduate engineering students at institutions like HKBK College of Engineering affiliated to VTU.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.