More-than-human geomorphologies

We propose more-than-human (MTH) geomorphologies as a conceptual reframing for undertaking socially situated, geographical and holistic landscape science. With increasing momentum in the environmental social sciences, more-than-human approaches offer less anthropocentric ways of perceiving landscapes and associated knowledge production. Here, the history of process conceptualisations in geomorphology, the study of the development and resultant landscape, is revisited from its geologic origins to its contemporary geographic framings. Historical and process geomorphologies have been separated throughout much of this history. Process philosophy, originated by Whitehead in 1925 but considered by geomorphologists much later, potentially offers a broader consideration of landscapes as relational and socially produced. This relational perspective shares many connections with Indigenous perspectives. MTH geomorphologies are presented as a logical extension to this history through its consideration of non-human agency. We ground our approach using a case study from New Zealand, showing how MTH approaches expand earlier approaches to landscape analysis. We discuss ways in which MTH geomorphologies could be facilitated and conducted in practice, emphasising the place-based and holistic nature of the method that makes for the best use of the best knowledge in each situation. We suggest MTH geomorphologies as a way to move beyond ‘who speaks for nature’, to allowing nature to speak for itself through more attentive practices that listen and understand landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333261450459
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More-than-human geomorphologies

Daniel Hikuroa, Brendon Blue, Megan Thomas, Gary Brierley
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

More-than-human geomorphologies

Daniel Hikuroa, Brendon Blue, Megan Thomas, Gary Brierley
article en

Abstract

We propose more-than-human (MTH) geomorphologies as a conceptual reframing for undertaking socially situated, geographical and holistic landscape science. With increasing momentum in the environmental social sciences, more-than-human approaches offer less anthropocentric ways of perceiving landscapes and associated knowledge production. Here, the history of process conceptualisations in geomorphology, the study of the development and resultant landscape, is revisited from its geologic origins to its contemporary geographic framings. Historical and process geomorphologies have been separated throughout much of this history. Process philosophy, originated by Whitehead in 1925 but considered by geomorphologists much later, potentially offers a broader consideration of landscapes as relational and socially produced. This relational perspective shares many connections with Indigenous perspectives. MTH geomorphologies are presented as a logical extension to this history through its consideration of non-human agency. We ground our approach using a case study from New Zealand, showing how MTH approaches expand earlier approaches to landscape analysis. We discuss ways in which MTH geomorphologies could be facilitated and conducted in practice, emphasising the place-based and holistic nature of the method that makes for the best use of the best knowledge in each situation. We suggest MTH geomorphologies as a way to move beyond ‘who speaks for nature’, to allowing nature to speak for itself through more attentive practices that listen and understand landscapes.

Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
University of Auckland (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
George Mason Centre for the Natural Environment, University of Auckland
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.