Assessing the carbon footprint of artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric and institutional analysis

Abstract The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across higher education has transformed research, teaching, and institutional operations. Yet its environmental implications remain poorly understood at the institutional level. While a growing literature examines the energy consumption and carbon footprint of AI systems, little is known about how these concerns are recognised or addressed within universities. This study addresses this gap by combining a bibliometric analysis of 461 peer-reviewed publications indexed in Scopus (2014–2025) with a multiple-case study analysis of selected research-intensive universities. The bibliometric analysis reveals a rapidly expanding research landscape dominated by themes such as machine learning, energy consumption, optimisation, and sustainability, alongside a comparatively limited focus on higher education as an institutional context. The case studies, based on sustainability reports, climate action plans, and environmental disclosures, focus on a set of research-intensive universities with substantial AI-related infrastructure. They show a consistent pattern: despite the centrality of high-performance computing (HPC) and cloud-based platforms, institutional reporting of energy and carbon emissions remains aggregated, rarely examining AI-specific impacts. This reveals a governance gap between the expanding scientific understanding of AI’s environmental footprint and the maturity of sustainability practices in academia. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of bibliometric analysis with institutional case study evidence to systematically examine how AI-related energy use and carbon emissions are addressed in higher education. By bridging these two analytical dimensions, the study provides new insight into the disconnect between research advances and institutional practice and highlights the need for dedicated frameworks to account for AI-related energy use and emissions. The study also aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7), Climate Action (SDG 13), and Quality Education (SDG 4), contributing to the ongoing debate on responsible and sustainable AI in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01414-8
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the carbon footprint of artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric and institutional analysis

Abdulaziz I. Almulhim, Johannes M. Luetz, Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Walter Leal Filho
Environmental Sciences Europe
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Assessing the carbon footprint of artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric and institutional analysis

Abdulaziz I. Almulhim, Johannes M. Luetz, Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Walter Leal Filho
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across higher education has transformed research, teaching, and institutional operations. Yet its environmental implications remain poorly understood at the institutional level. While a growing literature examines the energy consumption and carbon footprint of AI systems, little is known about how these concerns are recognised or addressed within universities. This study addresses this gap by combining a bibliometric analysis of 461 peer-reviewed publications indexed in Scopus (2014–2025) with a multiple-case study analysis of selected research-intensive universities. The bibliometric analysis reveals a rapidly expanding research landscape dominated by themes such as machine learning, energy consumption, optimisation, and sustainability, alongside a comparatively limited focus on higher education as an institutional context. The case studies, based on sustainability reports, climate action plans, and environmental disclosures, focus on a set of research-intensive universities with substantial AI-related infrastructure. They show a consistent pattern: despite the centrality of high-performance computing (HPC) and cloud-based platforms, institutional reporting of energy and carbon emissions remains aggregated, rarely examining AI-specific impacts. This reveals a governance gap between the expanding scientific understanding of AI’s environmental footprint and the maturity of sustainability practices in academia. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of bibliometric analysis with institutional case study evidence to systematically examine how AI-related energy use and carbon emissions are addressed in higher education. By bridging these two analytical dimensions, the study provides new insight into the disconnect between research advances and institutional practice and highlights the need for dedicated frameworks to account for AI-related energy use and emissions. The study also aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7), Climate Action (SDG 13), and Quality Education (SDG 4), contributing to the ongoing debate on responsible and sustainable AI in higher education.

Environmental Sciences Europe
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Alphacrucis University College (AU), Fernando Pessoa University (PT), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), HAW Hamburg (DE), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA), University of Coimbra (PT)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.