Effectiveness of a co-produced peer group for borderline personality disorder: connection and recovery

BACKGROUND: The co-production of peer groups alongside people with lived experience of complex mental health challenges may enhance engagement and support recovery. Few studies examine this approach among people with borderline personality disorder. AIMS: To evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and effectiveness of a 10-week co-produced peer group for people with borderline personality disorder. METHODS: Participants provided informed consent and completed assessments of recovery, mental health confidence, belonging, and personality functioning at baseline, group completion, and 3-month follow-up. Group acceptability and appropriateness were rated anonymously. Analysis accounted for changes to modality (face-to-face and online) necessitated during the pandemic. RESULTS: = 51) outcomes. Small to moderate improvements were observed across most recovery domains, mental health confidence, belonging and personality functioning between baseline and post-group. Improvements in clinical recovery occurred post-group for those in the online modality. Across both modalities confidence in coping was significantly different at 3-month follow-up compared to baseline. At 3-month follow-up, personality functioning outcomes remained significantly different from baseline. The group's appropriateness and acceptability were rated above average. CONCLUSIONS: A co-produced peer group for people with borderline personality disorder was appropriate and demonstrated gains across recovery domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2672345
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of a co-produced peer group for borderline personality disorder: connection and recovery

Dianna R. Bartsch, Laura Cooke-O’Connor, Jessica A Giles, Nicola J. Tomlinson
Journal of Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Effectiveness of a co-produced peer group for borderline personality disorder: connection and recovery

Dianna R. Bartsch, Laura Cooke-O’Connor, Jessica A Giles, Nicola J. Tomlinson
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The co-production of peer groups alongside people with lived experience of complex mental health challenges may enhance engagement and support recovery. Few studies examine this approach among people with borderline personality disorder. AIMS: To evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and effectiveness of a 10-week co-produced peer group for people with borderline personality disorder. METHODS: Participants provided informed consent and completed assessments of recovery, mental health confidence, belonging, and personality functioning at baseline, group completion, and 3-month follow-up. Group acceptability and appropriateness were rated anonymously. Analysis accounted for changes to modality (face-to-face and online) necessitated during the pandemic. RESULTS: = 51) outcomes. Small to moderate improvements were observed across most recovery domains, mental health confidence, belonging and personality functioning between baseline and post-group. Improvements in clinical recovery occurred post-group for those in the online modality. Across both modalities confidence in coping was significantly different at 3-month follow-up compared to baseline. At 3-month follow-up, personality functioning outcomes remained significantly different from baseline. The group's appropriateness and acceptability were rated above average. CONCLUSIONS: A co-produced peer group for people with borderline personality disorder was appropriate and demonstrated gains across recovery domains.

Journal of Mental Health
Health Net (US), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.