Catheter ablation of epicardial premature ventricular complexes in patients with and without cardiac scar

BACKGROUND: The left ventricular epicardium is a common site of origin (SOO) among patients with idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) undergoing catheter ablation procedures. Less is known about epicardial PVC ablation among patients with myocardial scarring. The objective of this paper is to report on the presence and impact of cardiac scar among patients with epicardial PVCs undergoing ablation procedures. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, patients with epicardial PVCs and late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging were included. Acute and long-term procedural outcomes were examined and stratified by the presence or absence of cardiac scar. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (male 17/29(59%), age 55±14 years, ejection fraction 48±12%, PVC burden 25±12%, ischemic cardiomyopathy (CM) n = 3, non-ischemic CM n = 7, PVC induced CM n = 5). The SOO was left ventricular summit (n = 20), great cardiac vein (n = 2), cardiac crux (n = 4), or basal anterolateral epicardium (n = 3). Ablation within the CVS was limited by proximity to the coronary arteries (n = 16), inaccessibility of ablation catheter (n = 5), or elevated baseline impedance (n = 2). LGE-CMR scar was present at the arrhythmia SOO in 14/29(48%) patients. There were no differences in procedural, radiofrequency, or fluoroscopy times between patients with and without scar (p > 0.05). Ablation was successful in 14/29 patients and partially successful in 8/29 patients; the post-ablation PVC burden was 8±10% with no differences among those with or without cardiac scar (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Epicardial PVCs may be encountered in patients with and without structural heart disease, with LGE-CMR located at the PVC SOO in almost half of the patients. While LGE-CMR remains a powerful diagnostic modality, its utility in predicting procedural outcomes for epicardial PVC ablation may be limited. Among consecutive patients undergoing ablation of premature ventricular complexes with an epicardial origin, LGE-CMR defined scar was present at the site of origin in approximately 50% of patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02351-5
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catheter ablation of epicardial premature ventricular complexes in patients with and without cardiac scar

Krit Jongnarangsin, Jackson Jeikai Liang, Rakesh Latchamsetty, Sania Jiwani et al.
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Catheter ablation of epicardial premature ventricular complexes in patients with and without cardiac scar

Krit Jongnarangsin, Jackson Jeikai Liang, Rakesh Latchamsetty, Sania Jiwani, Frank Bogun, Amrish Deshmukh, Michael Ghannam, Muazzum Shah, Kelly Arps, Hakan Oral, Fred Morady, Thomas Crawford
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The left ventricular epicardium is a common site of origin (SOO) among patients with idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) undergoing catheter ablation procedures. Less is known about epicardial PVC ablation among patients with myocardial scarring. The objective of this paper is to report on the presence and impact of cardiac scar among patients with epicardial PVCs undergoing ablation procedures. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, patients with epicardial PVCs and late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging were included. Acute and long-term procedural outcomes were examined and stratified by the presence or absence of cardiac scar. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (male 17/29(59%), age 55±14 years, ejection fraction 48±12%, PVC burden 25±12%, ischemic cardiomyopathy (CM) n = 3, non-ischemic CM n = 7, PVC induced CM n = 5). The SOO was left ventricular summit (n = 20), great cardiac vein (n = 2), cardiac crux (n = 4), or basal anterolateral epicardium (n = 3). Ablation within the CVS was limited by proximity to the coronary arteries (n = 16), inaccessibility of ablation catheter (n = 5), or elevated baseline impedance (n = 2). LGE-CMR scar was present at the arrhythmia SOO in 14/29(48%) patients. There were no differences in procedural, radiofrequency, or fluoroscopy times between patients with and without scar (p > 0.05). Ablation was successful in 14/29 patients and partially successful in 8/29 patients; the post-ablation PVC burden was 8±10% with no differences among those with or without cardiac scar (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Epicardial PVCs may be encountered in patients with and without structural heart disease, with LGE-CMR located at the PVC SOO in almost half of the patients. While LGE-CMR remains a powerful diagnostic modality, its utility in predicting procedural outcomes for epicardial PVC ablation may be limited. Among consecutive patients undergoing ablation of premature ventricular complexes with an epicardial origin, LGE-CMR defined scar was present at the site of origin in approximately 50% of patients.

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.