Enhancing corporate innovation through generative AI: A case study on Human–AI collaboration

Although Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is revolutionizing corporate innovation processes, little is known about how it fits into Design Thinking (DT). This study uses an exploratory case study in a corporate innovation workshop to examine how GenAI affects three essential DT components: trend identification, brainstorming, and feedback. Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed participants' perceptions before and after DT activities with and without GenAI help. Our findings demonstrate that GenAI accelerates ideation, improves creative confidence, and promotes trend analysis and feedback integration. However, ethical concerns regarding AI bias and transparency also exist, which emphasizes how important it is to use AI ethically. Human judgement is necessary at every evaluation stage to ensure morally sound and contextually relevant decision-making, even while GenAI promotes efficiency and alternative thinking. This study contributes to the emerging discourse on AI-human collaboration in innovation, offering insights for organizations seeking to integrate GenAI into human-centered design processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102867
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing corporate innovation through generative AI: A case study on Human–AI collaboration

T. Pena, G. Victorino, A.S. Cunha, J.V. Cordeiro
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Enhancing corporate innovation through generative AI: A case study on Human–AI collaboration

T. Pena, G. Victorino, A.S. Cunha, J.V. Cordeiro
article en

Abstract

Although Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is revolutionizing corporate innovation processes, little is known about how it fits into Design Thinking (DT). This study uses an exploratory case study in a corporate innovation workshop to examine how GenAI affects three essential DT components: trend identification, brainstorming, and feedback. Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed participants' perceptions before and after DT activities with and without GenAI help. Our findings demonstrate that GenAI accelerates ideation, improves creative confidence, and promotes trend analysis and feedback integration. However, ethical concerns regarding AI bias and transparency also exist, which emphasizes how important it is to use AI ethically. Human judgement is necessary at every evaluation stage to ensure morally sound and contextually relevant decision-making, even while GenAI promotes efficiency and alternative thinking. This study contributes to the emerging discourse on AI-human collaboration in innovation, offering insights for organizations seeking to integrate GenAI into human-centered design processes.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.