Freedom of Worship and the Armed Forces in Early Twentieth-Century England

During 1930, the British government ordered that special intercessory prayers appointed by leaders of the English Protestant churches were not to be said by naval, army and air force chaplains. This order provoked widespread ecclesiastical and political protests. Ironically, since the intercessions were concerned with religious persecution in Soviet Russia, the government order infringed the principle of freedom of worship. This article considers the reasons for the government ban, and why the controversy did not provoke a crisis in relations between the churches, the military authorities and the state. It is particularly concerned with the attitudes of free church leaders, those most sensitive towards the principle of religious liberty, and especially with their apparently paradoxical acceptance of compulsory attendance at religious services in the armed forces. It connects this episode with a general change in free church attitudes towards the state, the Church of England and national institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Church History
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/stc.2026.10056
Primary Topic
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom of Worship and the Armed Forces in Early Twentieth-Century England

Philip Williamson
Studies in Church History
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
article

Freedom of Worship and the Armed Forces in Early Twentieth-Century England

Philip Williamson
article en

Abstract

During 1930, the British government ordered that special intercessory prayers appointed by leaders of the English Protestant churches were not to be said by naval, army and air force chaplains. This order provoked widespread ecclesiastical and political protests. Ironically, since the intercessions were concerned with religious persecution in Soviet Russia, the government order infringed the principle of freedom of worship. This article considers the reasons for the government ban, and why the controversy did not provoke a crisis in relations between the churches, the military authorities and the state. It is particularly concerned with the attitudes of free church leaders, those most sensitive towards the principle of religious liberty, and especially with their apparently paradoxical acceptance of compulsory attendance at religious services in the armed forces. It connects this episode with a general change in free church attitudes towards the state, the Church of England and national institutions.

Studies in Church HistoryVol. 62
Durham University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Freedom of Worship and the Armed Forces in Early Twentieth-Century England — Philip Williamson · Studies in Church History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS