A Comprehensive Alignment Framework for Building Coherence in an Assessment System

Abstract Traditional alignment studies that are narrowly focused on content standards and assessment items and are conducted postadministration often lack the timeliness and utility needed to improve assessment systems. This paper introduces a flexible alignment framework centered on assessment‐system coherence. Our framework broadens alignment evaluation to include all interconnected elements, from domain definition to score use. We advocate for proactive alignment evaluation by defining expectations in advance and gathering both procedural and empirical evidence throughout the assessment life cycle. By addressing three guiding questions regarding system elements that need to be aligned, the purpose of the alignment evidence, and the types of evidence to use, developers can create customized evaluation plans to enhance alignment during development. The paper provides example alignment questions and an example application of the framework. We discuss the framework's potential to enhance the coherence of assessment systems in the service of meaningful policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.70027
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Alignment Framework for Building Coherence in an Assessment System

Meagan Karvonen, Brooke Nash, Sue Bechard, Claudia Flowers et al.
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Software Engineering Research
article

A Comprehensive Alignment Framework for Building Coherence in an Assessment System

Meagan Karvonen, Brooke Nash, Sue Bechard, Claudia Flowers, Russell Swinburne Romine, Amy Clark
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditional alignment studies that are narrowly focused on content standards and assessment items and are conducted postadministration often lack the timeliness and utility needed to improve assessment systems. This paper introduces a flexible alignment framework centered on assessment‐system coherence. Our framework broadens alignment evaluation to include all interconnected elements, from domain definition to score use. We advocate for proactive alignment evaluation by defining expectations in advance and gathering both procedural and empirical evidence throughout the assessment life cycle. By addressing three guiding questions regarding system elements that need to be aligned, the purpose of the alignment evidence, and the types of evidence to use, developers can create customized evaluation plans to enhance alignment during development. The paper provides example alignment questions and an example application of the framework. We discuss the framework's potential to enhance the coherence of assessment systems in the service of meaningful policy and practice.

Educational Measurement Issues and PracticeVol. 45(2)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), University of Kansas (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.