Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Abstract Purpose of Review This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the relationship between visual impairment and driving safety in older adults, with a focus on the visual functions required for safe driving, the impact of common visual deficits, and current approaches to clinical evaluation and management. Recent Findings Recent studies have strengthened evidence that visual functions beyond high contrast visual acuity--particularly visual field sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and visual processing speed--are associated with driving performance and crash risk. Emerging studies also highlight the role of higher-order visuospatial processing and the integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems. Advances in functional assessment tools and in-vehicle technologies, such as advanced driver-assistance systems, may further enhance evaluation and support driving safety. Summary Driving safety in older adults with visual impairment is multifactorial and cannot be adequately assessed by a single visual measure. A multidomain approach incorporating visual, cognitive, and functional assessment is essential for clinical decision-making. Management should emphasize treatment of reversible conditions, patient-centered counseling, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Future research should focus on developing functionally relevant, real-world measures to better guide clinical practice and policy. Opinion Statement Driving is a visually intensive activity that plays a central role in maintaining independence, mobility, and social participation for older adults. As global populations age, the number of older drivers is increasing, making safe mobility an important public health concern. Visual impairment is common in later life and may arise from both ocular disease and neurologic conditions affecting the visual pathways or higher-order visual processing. Although driver licensing systems worldwide rely heavily on visual acuity thresholds to determine visual fitness to drive, growing evidence indicates that visual acuity alone provides an incomplete assessment of driving safety. Safe driving depends on the coordinated function of multiple visual domains, including central vision, peripheral vision, contrast sensitivity, motion and depth perception, visual processing speed, and higher-order visuospatial processing. Impairments in these domains may compromise hazard detection, situational awareness, and timely responses to changing traffic conditions, even when central visual acuity remains relatively preserved. In addition, driving performance requires integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems, which may be affected by neurologic disease and age-related changes in sensory processing. Clinical evaluation of older drivers with visual impairment should therefore extend beyond visual acuity to incorporate multidomain assessment of visual and neurologic function when concerns arise. Management strategies should prioritize treatment of reversible visual conditions, patient counseling regarding adaptive driving behaviors, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Ultimately, decisions regarding driving must balance preservation of independence with public safety. Continued research is needed to develop evidence-based screening strategies and policies that better reflect the complex visual demands of real-world driving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Treatment Options in Neurology
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-026-00871-z
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Lindsey B. De Lott, Shu Xu, Joshua R. Ehrlich
Current Treatment Options in Neurology
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Lindsey B. De Lott, Shu Xu, Joshua R. Ehrlich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the relationship between visual impairment and driving safety in older adults, with a focus on the visual functions required for safe driving, the impact of common visual deficits, and current approaches to clinical evaluation and management. Recent Findings Recent studies have strengthened evidence that visual functions beyond high contrast visual acuity--particularly visual field sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and visual processing speed--are associated with driving performance and crash risk. Emerging studies also highlight the role of higher-order visuospatial processing and the integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems. Advances in functional assessment tools and in-vehicle technologies, such as advanced driver-assistance systems, may further enhance evaluation and support driving safety. Summary Driving safety in older adults with visual impairment is multifactorial and cannot be adequately assessed by a single visual measure. A multidomain approach incorporating visual, cognitive, and functional assessment is essential for clinical decision-making. Management should emphasize treatment of reversible conditions, patient-centered counseling, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Future research should focus on developing functionally relevant, real-world measures to better guide clinical practice and policy. Opinion Statement Driving is a visually intensive activity that plays a central role in maintaining independence, mobility, and social participation for older adults. As global populations age, the number of older drivers is increasing, making safe mobility an important public health concern. Visual impairment is common in later life and may arise from both ocular disease and neurologic conditions affecting the visual pathways or higher-order visual processing. Although driver licensing systems worldwide rely heavily on visual acuity thresholds to determine visual fitness to drive, growing evidence indicates that visual acuity alone provides an incomplete assessment of driving safety. Safe driving depends on the coordinated function of multiple visual domains, including central vision, peripheral vision, contrast sensitivity, motion and depth perception, visual processing speed, and higher-order visuospatial processing. Impairments in these domains may compromise hazard detection, situational awareness, and timely responses to changing traffic conditions, even when central visual acuity remains relatively preserved. In addition, driving performance requires integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems, which may be affected by neurologic disease and age-related changes in sensory processing. Clinical evaluation of older drivers with visual impairment should therefore extend beyond visual acuity to incorporate multidomain assessment of visual and neurologic function when concerns arise. Management strategies should prioritize treatment of reversible visual conditions, patient counseling regarding adaptive driving behaviors, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Ultimately, decisions regarding driving must balance preservation of independence with public safety. Continued research is needed to develop evidence-based screening strategies and policies that better reflect the complex visual demands of real-world driving.

Current Treatment Options in NeurologyVol. 28(1)
University of Michigan (US), Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.