USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge performance by disability, race, and ethnicity in U.S. medical students: A multi-site study

IMPORTANCE: With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) has become a high-stakes component of residency selection. This shift raises concerns that increased reliance on Step 2 CK may exacerbate existing inequities, particularly for medical students with disabilities and those with intersecting marginalized identities. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in USMLE Step 2 CK performance by disability status, race, ethnicity, and their intersections among U.S. medical students. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Pathways II dataset, comprising deidentified student-level data from nine U.S. MD-granting medical schools. Graduated students from the 2020-2023 cohorts were included. Medical students with disabilities were defined as those formally registered with institutional disability resource offices and were matched 1:2 with nondisabled peers by institution, gender, graduation cohort, and MCAT score. Race and ethnicity were categorized as White, Asian, underrepresented in medicine (URiM, including American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander), or Other. Disability categories included ADHD, learning, psychological, mobility/sensory, chronic health, or other. Multivariable linear regression models estimated adjusted Step 2 CK score differences by disability status, race, ethnicity, and their interactions, adjusting for MCAT score and clustering standard errors at the school level. RESULTS: Among 1,350 students, 448 (33.2%) had a registered disability. The mean Step 2 CK score was 244.3 (SD, 15.1). Students with disabilities scored lower than nondisabled peers (mean 239.6 vs 246.7; adjusted β, -7.02; 95% CI, -8.76 to -5.28). Students with ADHD, learning, or psychological disabilities scored 9-11 points lower than nondisabled peers (P < .001). URiM students scored lower than White students overall (adjusted β, -8.50; 95% CI, -10.74 to -6.25). Intersectional analysis demonstrated that disparities were largest among URiM and Asian students with disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students with disabilities experience significant disparities in Step 2 CK performance, particularly those with cognitive-based disabilities and intersecting marginalized identities. As Step 2 CK plays a larger role in residency selection, addressing structural barriers in assessment and accommodation processes is critical to advancing equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349774
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge performance by disability, race, and ethnicity in U.S. medical students: A multi-site study

Lisa M. Meeks, Karina Pereira‐Lima, Michael Kim, Mytien Nguyen et al.
PLoS ONE
Innovations in Medical Education
article

USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge performance by disability, race, and ethnicity in U.S. medical students: A multi-site study

Lisa M. Meeks, Karina Pereira‐Lima, Michael Kim, Mytien Nguyen, Elizabeth Holman, Tiffany Hodgens, Jordan Juliao, J. T. Sangsland, Dowin Boatright
article en

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) has become a high-stakes component of residency selection. This shift raises concerns that increased reliance on Step 2 CK may exacerbate existing inequities, particularly for medical students with disabilities and those with intersecting marginalized identities. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in USMLE Step 2 CK performance by disability status, race, ethnicity, and their intersections among U.S. medical students. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Pathways II dataset, comprising deidentified student-level data from nine U.S. MD-granting medical schools. Graduated students from the 2020-2023 cohorts were included. Medical students with disabilities were defined as those formally registered with institutional disability resource offices and were matched 1:2 with nondisabled peers by institution, gender, graduation cohort, and MCAT score. Race and ethnicity were categorized as White, Asian, underrepresented in medicine (URiM, including American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander), or Other. Disability categories included ADHD, learning, psychological, mobility/sensory, chronic health, or other. Multivariable linear regression models estimated adjusted Step 2 CK score differences by disability status, race, ethnicity, and their interactions, adjusting for MCAT score and clustering standard errors at the school level. RESULTS: Among 1,350 students, 448 (33.2%) had a registered disability. The mean Step 2 CK score was 244.3 (SD, 15.1). Students with disabilities scored lower than nondisabled peers (mean 239.6 vs 246.7; adjusted β, -7.02; 95% CI, -8.76 to -5.28). Students with ADHD, learning, or psychological disabilities scored 9-11 points lower than nondisabled peers (P < .001). URiM students scored lower than White students overall (adjusted β, -8.50; 95% CI, -10.74 to -6.25). Intersectional analysis demonstrated that disparities were largest among URiM and Asian students with disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students with disabilities experience significant disparities in Step 2 CK performance, particularly those with cognitive-based disabilities and intersecting marginalized identities. As Step 2 CK plays a larger role in residency selection, addressing structural barriers in assessment and accommodation processes is critical to advancing equity.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Illinois College (US), University of Michigan (US), Yale University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Michigan United (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), New York University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Ford Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.