Potentially Toxic Metal Flux and Bioaccumulation Pathways in Buffaloes from Rural and Urban Agroecosystems: a Multi-Matrix Environmental Health Assessment

Potentially toxic metal contamination in agroecosystems poses a growing risk to environmental and food safety, particularly in arid regions where water scarcity enhances metal accumulation and increases reliance on groundwater irrigation. However, integrated assessments across environmental and biological matrices remain limited. This study quantified chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and nickel (Ni) in irrigation water, soil, forage, milk, and hair samples collected from rural and urban buffalo-rearing systems in Bhalwal, Punjab, Pakistan. Samples were subjected to acid digestion followed by quantification using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Measured concentrations in irrigation water ranged from 0.0025 to 0.047 mg/L (Cr), 1.45 to 6.70 mg/L (Fe), 0.018 to 0.097 mg/L (Mn), and 0.015 to 2.30 mg/L (Ni). While Cr and Mn remained below WHO and USEPA guideline limits (0.05-0.1 mg/L for Cr; 0.05-0.4 mg/L for Mn), Fe (limit: 0.3 mg/L) and Ni (limit: 0.07-0.1 mg/L) exceeded permissible levels at several sites, particularly in urban areas. Similar trends were observed in soil and forage, with elevated concentrations of Fe (up to 75.50 mg/kg) and Ni (up to 15.60 mg/kg). In biological matrices, milk concentrations ranged from 0.910 to 3.376 mg/L (Cr), 0.363 to 1.473 mg/L (Fe), 0.683 to 1.166 mg/L (Mn), and 0.223 to 0.915 mg/L (Ni), with several values exceeding typical background levels reported in the literature. Hair samples showed comparatively higher metal accumulation, reflecting longer-term exposure. Although concentration gradients from environmental to biological samples were observed, these findings indicate potential accumulation patterns rather than definitive trophic transfer pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03256-y
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potentially Toxic Metal Flux and Bioaccumulation Pathways in Buffaloes from Rural and Urban Agroecosystems: a Multi-Matrix Environmental Health Assessment

İlker Uğulu, Ijaz Rasool Noorka, Saqib Bashir, Kausar Perveen et al.
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Heavy metals in environment
article

Potentially Toxic Metal Flux and Bioaccumulation Pathways in Buffaloes from Rural and Urban Agroecosystems: a Multi-Matrix Environmental Health Assessment

İlker Uğulu, Ijaz Rasool Noorka, Saqib Bashir, Kausar Perveen, Asma Ashfaq, Kafeel Ahmad, Zafar Iqbal Khan
article en

Abstract

Potentially toxic metal contamination in agroecosystems poses a growing risk to environmental and food safety, particularly in arid regions where water scarcity enhances metal accumulation and increases reliance on groundwater irrigation. However, integrated assessments across environmental and biological matrices remain limited. This study quantified chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and nickel (Ni) in irrigation water, soil, forage, milk, and hair samples collected from rural and urban buffalo-rearing systems in Bhalwal, Punjab, Pakistan. Samples were subjected to acid digestion followed by quantification using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Measured concentrations in irrigation water ranged from 0.0025 to 0.047 mg/L (Cr), 1.45 to 6.70 mg/L (Fe), 0.018 to 0.097 mg/L (Mn), and 0.015 to 2.30 mg/L (Ni). While Cr and Mn remained below WHO and USEPA guideline limits (0.05-0.1 mg/L for Cr; 0.05-0.4 mg/L for Mn), Fe (limit: 0.3 mg/L) and Ni (limit: 0.07-0.1 mg/L) exceeded permissible levels at several sites, particularly in urban areas. Similar trends were observed in soil and forage, with elevated concentrations of Fe (up to 75.50 mg/kg) and Ni (up to 15.60 mg/kg). In biological matrices, milk concentrations ranged from 0.910 to 3.376 mg/L (Cr), 0.363 to 1.473 mg/L (Fe), 0.683 to 1.166 mg/L (Mn), and 0.223 to 0.915 mg/L (Ni), with several values exceeding typical background levels reported in the literature. Hair samples showed comparatively higher metal accumulation, reflecting longer-term exposure. Although concentration gradients from environmental to biological samples were observed, these findings indicate potential accumulation patterns rather than definitive trophic transfer pathways.

Environmental Geochemistry and HealthVol. 48(8)
University of Sargodha (PK), Usak University (TR), Ghazi University (PK), Baba Guru Nanak University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Heavy metals in environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.