Corepam: a 24-gene PAM50-derived expression score with cross-platform external validation for breast cancer prognosis

BACKGROUND: The PAM50 classifier predicts breast cancer prognosis but requires 50 genes and specialised platforms. We derived CorePAM, the smallest data-driven PAM50 subset maintaining non-inferior prognostic performance relative to a full 50-gene Cox elastic-net model, without pre-specifying gene count. METHODS: Cox elastic-net regression ([Formula: see text]) with deterministic 10-fold cross-validation was applied in the SCAN-B cohort (N = 3069; GSE96058). Gene selection followed a pre-specified non-inferiority margin (ΔC-index = 0.010). External validation used four independent cohorts: TCGA-BRCA (N = 1072; RNA-seq), METABRIC (N = 1978; microarray; disease-specific survival), GSE20685 (N = 327; microarray), and GSE1456 (N = 159; microarray). Incremental value over a clinical model (CORE-A: age and ER status) was assessed by bootstrap ΔC-index. Secondary analyses evaluated pathologic complete response (pCR) prediction in four neoadjuvant cohorts (N = 697) plus I-SPY2 (N = 986). RESULTS: CorePAM comprises 24 genes with an out-of-fold C-index of 0.670 (gap vs 50-gene maximum: 0.009). The score was independently associated with survival in all validation cohorts: TCGA-BRCA (HR = 1.20), METABRIC DSS (HR = 1.41), GSE20685 (HR = 1.40), GSE1456 (HR = 1.71); all [Formula: see text]. Random-effects meta-analysis (K = 4) yielded pooled HR = 1.37 (95% CI 1.24-1.52; [Formula: see text] = 38.2%; [Formula: see text]). CorePAM provided incremental value beyond CORE-A and remained significant after adjustment for T-stage and nodal status. For pCR, pooled OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.39-2.05; [Formula: see text] = 0%; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: CorePAM-a 24-gene PAM50-derived score-met the pre-specified ΔC-index non-inferiority criterion relative to a 50-gene Cox elastic-net comparator in derivation and retained prognostic discrimination across four external RNA-seq and microarray cohorts, remained significant after anatomical staging adjustment, and was associated with pCR in secondary neoadjuvant analyses. This reduction from 50 to 24 genes may simplify future assay development, although platform-specific analytical validation is required before clinical deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-026-02298-5
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corepam: a 24-gene PAM50-derived expression score with cross-platform external validation for breast cancer prognosis

Rafael de Negreiros Botan, João Batista de Sousa
Breast Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Corepam: a 24-gene PAM50-derived expression score with cross-platform external validation for breast cancer prognosis

Rafael de Negreiros Botan, João Batista de Sousa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PAM50 classifier predicts breast cancer prognosis but requires 50 genes and specialised platforms. We derived CorePAM, the smallest data-driven PAM50 subset maintaining non-inferior prognostic performance relative to a full 50-gene Cox elastic-net model, without pre-specifying gene count. METHODS: Cox elastic-net regression ([Formula: see text]) with deterministic 10-fold cross-validation was applied in the SCAN-B cohort (N = 3069; GSE96058). Gene selection followed a pre-specified non-inferiority margin (ΔC-index = 0.010). External validation used four independent cohorts: TCGA-BRCA (N = 1072; RNA-seq), METABRIC (N = 1978; microarray; disease-specific survival), GSE20685 (N = 327; microarray), and GSE1456 (N = 159; microarray). Incremental value over a clinical model (CORE-A: age and ER status) was assessed by bootstrap ΔC-index. Secondary analyses evaluated pathologic complete response (pCR) prediction in four neoadjuvant cohorts (N = 697) plus I-SPY2 (N = 986). RESULTS: CorePAM comprises 24 genes with an out-of-fold C-index of 0.670 (gap vs 50-gene maximum: 0.009). The score was independently associated with survival in all validation cohorts: TCGA-BRCA (HR = 1.20), METABRIC DSS (HR = 1.41), GSE20685 (HR = 1.40), GSE1456 (HR = 1.71); all [Formula: see text]. Random-effects meta-analysis (K = 4) yielded pooled HR = 1.37 (95% CI 1.24-1.52; [Formula: see text] = 38.2%; [Formula: see text]). CorePAM provided incremental value beyond CORE-A and remained significant after adjustment for T-stage and nodal status. For pCR, pooled OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.39-2.05; [Formula: see text] = 0%; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: CorePAM-a 24-gene PAM50-derived score-met the pre-specified ΔC-index non-inferiority criterion relative to a 50-gene Cox elastic-net comparator in derivation and retained prognostic discrimination across four external RNA-seq and microarray cohorts, remained significant after anatomical staging adjustment, and was associated with pCR in secondary neoadjuvant analyses. This reduction from 50 to 24 genes may simplify future assay development, although platform-specific analytical validation is required before clinical deployment.

Breast Cancer Research
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.