Assessing diagnostic performance of multimodal LLMs and a custom convolutional neural network in tooth-level caries detection and localization

BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence is reshaping dental diagnostics through automated interpretation of images. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) demonstrate high accuracy via domain-specific training, multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Flash have recently acquired visual-reasoning capabilities without task-specific fine-tuning. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the diagnostic performance of these LLMs with a custom CNN for detecting and localizing dental caries on intraoral images. METHODS: This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study used 22 occlusal-view intraoral images. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and a YOLOv5s-based CNN analyzed each image for caries detection and localization. Quantitative evaluation assessed decay detection using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and F1 score. Inter-model differences were analyzed using McNemar's test. Additionally, a descriptive qualitative evaluation was performed by specialist dentists, who rated each model's output for realism, diagnostic accuracy, bounding-box precision, and absence of unnecessary annotations using a 3-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The CNN achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (97.2%), sensitivity (86.7%), and F-1 score (88.0%). Gemini 2.5 Flash outperformed ChatGPT-4o in sensitivity (76.4 vs. 66.2%) and F-1 score (74.3 vs. 68.7%). Overall, CNN's performance was significantly superior (p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found between the two LLMs (p = 0.541). Qualitatively, CNN scored best for realism (90.9%), decay accuracy (79.5%), and bounding-box precision (93.1%). CONCLUSION: CNNs provide superior accuracy for caries localization compared with multimodal LLMs. However, LLMs demonstrate potential for generating clinically interpretable diagnostic summaries. Hybrid systems integrating CNN-based detection with LLM-driven reasoning may enhance decision-making and improve efficiency in dental diagnostic workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08590-2
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing diagnostic performance of multimodal LLMs and a custom convolutional neural network in tooth-level caries detection and localization

Aamna Khalid, Nighat Naved, Abhishek Lal, Niha Adnan et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Assessing diagnostic performance of multimodal LLMs and a custom convolutional neural network in tooth-level caries detection and localization

Aamna Khalid, Nighat Naved, Abhishek Lal, Niha Adnan, Sarang Suresh, Ayesha Nooruddin, Syed Muhammad Faizan Ahmed, Fahad Umer
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence is reshaping dental diagnostics through automated interpretation of images. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) demonstrate high accuracy via domain-specific training, multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Flash have recently acquired visual-reasoning capabilities without task-specific fine-tuning. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the diagnostic performance of these LLMs with a custom CNN for detecting and localizing dental caries on intraoral images. METHODS: This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study used 22 occlusal-view intraoral images. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and a YOLOv5s-based CNN analyzed each image for caries detection and localization. Quantitative evaluation assessed decay detection using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and F1 score. Inter-model differences were analyzed using McNemar's test. Additionally, a descriptive qualitative evaluation was performed by specialist dentists, who rated each model's output for realism, diagnostic accuracy, bounding-box precision, and absence of unnecessary annotations using a 3-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The CNN achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (97.2%), sensitivity (86.7%), and F-1 score (88.0%). Gemini 2.5 Flash outperformed ChatGPT-4o in sensitivity (76.4 vs. 66.2%) and F-1 score (74.3 vs. 68.7%). Overall, CNN's performance was significantly superior (p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found between the two LLMs (p = 0.541). Qualitatively, CNN scored best for realism (90.9%), decay accuracy (79.5%), and bounding-box precision (93.1%). CONCLUSION: CNNs provide superior accuracy for caries localization compared with multimodal LLMs. However, LLMs demonstrate potential for generating clinically interpretable diagnostic summaries. Hybrid systems integrating CNN-based detection with LLM-driven reasoning may enhance decision-making and improve efficiency in dental diagnostic workflows.

BMC Oral Health
Aga Khan University (PK), Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (PK), Aga Khan University Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.