Interbody Cages: Surface Technologies in Spinal Implants

➢ Implant surface characteristics play a critical role in promoting osseointegration and long-term spinal fusion success. ➢ Titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the most commonly utilized materials in interbody cages, each with distinct advantages and limitations. ➢ Surface modifications such as roughening, porosity, and hydroxyapatite coatings enhance osseointegration and early fusion outcomes. ➢ Emerging materials, including silicon nitride and porous tantalum, demonstrate favorable biological and mechanical properties but require further clinical validation. ➢ No single implant material or surface technology has shown consistent clinical superiority, highlighting the need for ongoing research and evidence-based selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.00904
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interbody Cages: Surface Technologies in Spinal Implants

Jinseong Kim, Ashley Knebel, Trevor L. Toavs, Joseph E. Nassar et al.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Interbody Cages: Surface Technologies in Spinal Implants

Jinseong Kim, Ashley Knebel, Trevor L. Toavs, Joseph E. Nassar, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Mohammad Daher, Lama A. Ammar, Alan H. Daniels
article en

Abstract

➢ Implant surface characteristics play a critical role in promoting osseointegration and long-term spinal fusion success. ➢ Titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the most commonly utilized materials in interbody cages, each with distinct advantages and limitations. ➢ Surface modifications such as roughening, porosity, and hydroxyapatite coatings enhance osseointegration and early fusion outcomes. ➢ Emerging materials, including silicon nitride and porous tantalum, demonstrate favorable biological and mechanical properties but require further clinical validation. ➢ No single implant material or surface technology has shown consistent clinical superiority, highlighting the need for ongoing research and evidence-based selection.

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
University of Miami (US), Duke University (US), Brown University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.