Severe splenic injury following elective colonoscopy: case illustrations and practice-informed insights from published experience

INTRODUCTION: Splenic injury following colonoscopy is a rare but potentially life-threatening iatrogenic complication. Recognition is often delayed because symptoms are nonspecific, and evidence guiding management remains fragmented. METHODS: We report two contrasting contemporary cases, one managed successfully with splenic artery embolisation (SAE) and one requiring splenectomy for haemorrhagic control, illustrating the spectrum of clinical presentation and management. To contextualise these cases, we conducted a denominator-aware synthesis of 129 published cases meeting inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 65.8 years (range 33-88), and 69.8% were female. Most patients (88.7%) presented within 24h of colonoscopy, although delayed cases occurred. Splenectomy was performed in 58.9% of cases, SAE in 10.1%, and conservative management in 33.3%, with an overall mortality of 5.5% among cases with reported outcomes. FINDINGS: Haemodynamic instability was strongly associated with operative treatment (odds ratio 9.11, 95% confidence interval 3.65-22.76), and splenectomy rates increased stepwise with higher computed tomography (CT) injury grades. Among haemodynamically stable patients, SAE was frequently definitive, avoiding splenectomy in all treated cases. These associations align with established trauma principles - management should be guided primarily by haemodynamic status. Early contrast-enhanced CT enables diagnosis and grading, while nonoperative management including SAE offers spleen-preserving control in stable patients. CONCLUSION: Splenic injury should be considered in any patient presenting after colonoscopy with abdominal pain, shoulder pain or haemodynamic disturbance. Early imaging, haemodynamic-based decision making, and appropriate follow-up can improve recognition, enable spleen preservation and reduce morbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0036
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Severe splenic injury following elective colonoscopy: case illustrations and practice-informed insights from published experience

O Oyeniyi, U Srinivasan, T Rockall, R Aseem
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Severe splenic injury following elective colonoscopy: case illustrations and practice-informed insights from published experience

O Oyeniyi, U Srinivasan, T Rockall, R Aseem
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Splenic injury following colonoscopy is a rare but potentially life-threatening iatrogenic complication. Recognition is often delayed because symptoms are nonspecific, and evidence guiding management remains fragmented. METHODS: We report two contrasting contemporary cases, one managed successfully with splenic artery embolisation (SAE) and one requiring splenectomy for haemorrhagic control, illustrating the spectrum of clinical presentation and management. To contextualise these cases, we conducted a denominator-aware synthesis of 129 published cases meeting inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 65.8 years (range 33-88), and 69.8% were female. Most patients (88.7%) presented within 24h of colonoscopy, although delayed cases occurred. Splenectomy was performed in 58.9% of cases, SAE in 10.1%, and conservative management in 33.3%, with an overall mortality of 5.5% among cases with reported outcomes. FINDINGS: Haemodynamic instability was strongly associated with operative treatment (odds ratio 9.11, 95% confidence interval 3.65-22.76), and splenectomy rates increased stepwise with higher computed tomography (CT) injury grades. Among haemodynamically stable patients, SAE was frequently definitive, avoiding splenectomy in all treated cases. These associations align with established trauma principles - management should be guided primarily by haemodynamic status. Early contrast-enhanced CT enables diagnosis and grading, while nonoperative management including SAE offers spleen-preserving control in stable patients. CONCLUSION: Splenic injury should be considered in any patient presenting after colonoscopy with abdominal pain, shoulder pain or haemodynamic disturbance. Early imaging, haemodynamic-based decision making, and appropriate follow-up can improve recognition, enable spleen preservation and reduce morbidity.

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.