Axioms and Observable Invariance for Sigma-Time Models

Sigma Transform Calculus uses bounded-variation clocks to describe systems whose effective evolution may include continuous clock mass, atomic updates, and physical-time intervals with no clock advance. A calculus of this kind requires more than a clock measure: it also requires an explicit distinction between representation and observable content, a fixed model identity, and a rule preventing later analytic papers from upgrading calibration choices into theorems. This paper supplies that axiomatic interface. We define a sigma-time model as declared data consisting of a clock, state and trajectory classes, gauge action, canonical representatives, admissible observables, units, model-identity ledger, calibration protocol, claim classes, and propagation duties. The main results show that gauge-invariant observables factor through canonical representatives, that deterministic canonicalization is required for meaningful comparison away from degeneracy, and that later papers may cite this interface only for observable invariance, model identity, prediction admissibility, and citation boundaries. We do not prove existence, uniqueness, transform theorems, numerical convergence, or PDE well-posedness here; those results belong to later papers whose hypotheses must satisfy this interface.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20319776
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Axioms and Observable Invariance for Sigma-Time Models

Ben F.T. Tibola
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

Axioms and Observable Invariance for Sigma-Time Models

Ben F.T. Tibola
preprint en

Abstract

Sigma Transform Calculus uses bounded-variation clocks to describe systems whose effective evolution may include continuous clock mass, atomic updates, and physical-time intervals with no clock advance. A calculus of this kind requires more than a clock measure: it also requires an explicit distinction between representation and observable content, a fixed model identity, and a rule preventing later analytic papers from upgrading calibration choices into theorems. This paper supplies that axiomatic interface. We define a sigma-time model as declared data consisting of a clock, state and trajectory classes, gauge action, canonical representatives, admissible observables, units, model-identity ledger, calibration protocol, claim classes, and propagation duties. The main results show that gauge-invariant observables factor through canonical representatives, that deterministic canonicalization is required for meaningful comparison away from degeneracy, and that later papers may cite this interface only for observable invariance, model identity, prediction admissibility, and citation boundaries. We do not prove existence, uniqueness, transform theorems, numerical convergence, or PDE well-posedness here; those results belong to later papers whose hypotheses must satisfy this interface.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.