Tumor capsule status modifies the survival impact of anatomical versus non-anatomical hepatectomy in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The oncologic superiority of anatomical resection (AR) over non-anatomical resection (NAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, and the extent to which tumor capsule integrity modifies the survival benefit of AR has not been well defined. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 1,958 patients with early-stage HCC who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy across seven institutions. Patients were classified according to hepatectomy type (AR vs. NAR) and tumor capsule status (complete, incomplete, or absent). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Ordered interaction analyses were conducted to assess effect modification between hepatectomy method and tumor capsule status. RESULTS: In IPTW-weighted analyses, NAR was independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.67; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.38; P < 0.001) compared with AR. Tumor capsule status showed a graded association with survival outcomes, with incomplete and absent capsules associated with progressively poorer OS and RFS. Importantly, a significant ordered interaction between hepatectomy method and tumor capsule status was observed for both OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.01; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.70; P < 0.001). Stratified analyses demonstrated no significant survival difference between AR and NAR in patients with complete capsule, whereas AR conferred a pronounced survival advantage in patients with absent capsule. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical resection is associated with improved oncologic outcomes in early-stage HCC overall; however, this survival benefit is strongly modified by tumor capsule status. These findings suggest that tumor capsule status may serve as an important stratification factor when evaluating the extent of liver resection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04376-6
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tumor capsule status modifies the survival impact of anatomical versus non-anatomical hepatectomy in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

Yuxin Tang, Y Zeng, Chihyuan cheng, Peng Zhu
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Tumor capsule status modifies the survival impact of anatomical versus non-anatomical hepatectomy in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

Yuxin Tang, Y Zeng, Chihyuan cheng, Peng Zhu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The oncologic superiority of anatomical resection (AR) over non-anatomical resection (NAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, and the extent to which tumor capsule integrity modifies the survival benefit of AR has not been well defined. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 1,958 patients with early-stage HCC who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy across seven institutions. Patients were classified according to hepatectomy type (AR vs. NAR) and tumor capsule status (complete, incomplete, or absent). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Ordered interaction analyses were conducted to assess effect modification between hepatectomy method and tumor capsule status. RESULTS: In IPTW-weighted analyses, NAR was independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.67; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.38; P < 0.001) compared with AR. Tumor capsule status showed a graded association with survival outcomes, with incomplete and absent capsules associated with progressively poorer OS and RFS. Importantly, a significant ordered interaction between hepatectomy method and tumor capsule status was observed for both OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.01; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.70; P < 0.001). Stratified analyses demonstrated no significant survival difference between AR and NAR in patients with complete capsule, whereas AR conferred a pronounced survival advantage in patients with absent capsule. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical resection is associated with improved oncologic outcomes in early-stage HCC overall; however, this survival benefit is strongly modified by tumor capsule status. These findings suggest that tumor capsule status may serve as an important stratification factor when evaluating the extent of liver resection.

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Fujian Medical University (CN), Wuhan No.1 Hospital (CN), Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN), Fujian Provincial Hospital (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.