Integrating Envirotyping and Phenomics for AI-Enabled Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction in Crop Breeding

Genomic prediction is now routine in crop improvement, but its main bottleneck has shifted from marker density to environmental complexity. Breeders rarely need predictions for one fixed environment; they need to rank genotypes across target populations of environments that differ in weather, soils, management, and stress timing. This makes genotype-by-environment interaction a primary breeding problem rather than a secondary statistical nuisance. This review examines how genomic, environmental, and phenomic information can be integrated to improve multi-environment prediction in crop breeding pipelines. The review is narrative rather than PRISMA-style, but the literature search and selection logic were structured and explicitly defined. Peer-reviewed English-language studies were identified through structured searches of Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus, supplemented by backward citation screening, with emphasis on literature published from January 2023 to March 2026. Four conclusions emerge. First, environmental information is most useful when it is developmentally aligned, biologically interpretable, and matched to the target population of environments. Second, strong structured statistical baselines remain highly competitive, especially in moderate-sized or highly unbalanced datasets, whereas gains from more flexible machine-learning and deep-learning approaches are most evident in large, sparse, heterogeneous, and multimodal settings. Third, phenomic markers often improve prediction for complex traits, especially yield, because they capture realized crop responses not fully represented by markers alone. Fourth, practical value depends less on isolated gains in predictive accuracy than on evaluation under realistic deployment scenarios, including untested genotype and untested environment settings. Progress therefore requires transparent reporting, benchmark design, stage-aware envirotyping, multimodal integration, uncertainty reporting, and cost-aware deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16101019
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Envirotyping and Phenomics for AI-Enabled Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction in Crop Breeding

Yongfu Ju, Yue Wang, S Y Yu, Xiongwei Liang et al.
Agronomy
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Integrating Envirotyping and Phenomics for AI-Enabled Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction in Crop Breeding

Yongfu Ju, Yue Wang, S Y Yu, Xiongwei Liang, Dawei Yin
article en

Abstract

Genomic prediction is now routine in crop improvement, but its main bottleneck has shifted from marker density to environmental complexity. Breeders rarely need predictions for one fixed environment; they need to rank genotypes across target populations of environments that differ in weather, soils, management, and stress timing. This makes genotype-by-environment interaction a primary breeding problem rather than a secondary statistical nuisance. This review examines how genomic, environmental, and phenomic information can be integrated to improve multi-environment prediction in crop breeding pipelines. The review is narrative rather than PRISMA-style, but the literature search and selection logic were structured and explicitly defined. Peer-reviewed English-language studies were identified through structured searches of Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus, supplemented by backward citation screening, with emphasis on literature published from January 2023 to March 2026. Four conclusions emerge. First, environmental information is most useful when it is developmentally aligned, biologically interpretable, and matched to the target population of environments. Second, strong structured statistical baselines remain highly competitive, especially in moderate-sized or highly unbalanced datasets, whereas gains from more flexible machine-learning and deep-learning approaches are most evident in large, sparse, heterogeneous, and multimodal settings. Third, phenomic markers often improve prediction for complex traits, especially yield, because they capture realized crop responses not fully represented by markers alone. Fourth, practical value depends less on isolated gains in predictive accuracy than on evaluation under realistic deployment scenarios, including untested genotype and untested environment settings. Progress therefore requires transparent reporting, benchmark design, stage-aware envirotyping, multimodal integration, uncertainty reporting, and cost-aware deployment.

AgronomyVol. 16(10)
Harbin University (CN), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.