Clinical Findings, Treatment Recommendations, and Outcome in Dogs Following Ingestion of a Single Unintended Dose of Trilostane: 403 Cases (2008–2023)

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical signs and outcomes in dogs following ingestion of a single, unintended dose of trilostane. The secondary objective was to describe treatment recommendations given for this population. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of cases of canine trilostane exposure from February 2008 to August 2023. SETTING: Private, specialty toxicology consultation service. ANIMALS: Four hundred three cases were selected from the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) Animal Poison Control Center AnTox database using a nonstratified sampling technique. Data included patient demographics, history, therapeutic use of trilostane, exposure history, diagnostic findings, treatment recommendations, and outcome. INTERVENTIONS: None. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The most common cause of trilostane exposure was ingestion of another dog's prescription (248/403 [61.5%]), followed by ingestion of extra or excessive dose(s) of the dog's own prescription (147/403 [36.5%]). Forty-one dogs (41/403 [10.2%]) had clinical signs attributable to trilostane exposure. Median onset of clinical signs after exposure was 2.5 h (range: 0.25-72 h). The most frequently reported clinical signs were vomiting (17/41 [41.5%]), lethargy (15/41 [36.6%]), and diarrhea (7/41 [17.0%]). Four cases (4/403 [0.99%]) were reported to require veterinary treatment for trilostane toxicosis. Of the cases with follow-up from the ASPCA (200/403 [49.6%]), most dogs (188/200 [93.5%]) developed no clinical signs from acute trilostane exposure. The median exposure dosage (13.2 mg/kg) in the 12 dogs that developed clinical signs was significantly higher than in those that did not (3.3 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that dogs ingesting a single, unintended dose of trilostane are likely to experience mild, self-limiting signs. The need for extensive hospitalization or aggressive medical care is unlikely, even with high single doses that exceed the published and Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic dosage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.70112
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Findings, Treatment Recommendations, and Outcome in Dogs Following Ingestion of a Single Unintended Dose of Trilostane: 403 Cases (2008–2023)

Jenny Schuett, Laura Stern, Lindsey Summers
Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
article

Clinical Findings, Treatment Recommendations, and Outcome in Dogs Following Ingestion of a Single Unintended Dose of Trilostane: 403 Cases (2008–2023)

Jenny Schuett, Laura Stern, Lindsey Summers
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical signs and outcomes in dogs following ingestion of a single, unintended dose of trilostane. The secondary objective was to describe treatment recommendations given for this population. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of cases of canine trilostane exposure from February 2008 to August 2023. SETTING: Private, specialty toxicology consultation service. ANIMALS: Four hundred three cases were selected from the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) Animal Poison Control Center AnTox database using a nonstratified sampling technique. Data included patient demographics, history, therapeutic use of trilostane, exposure history, diagnostic findings, treatment recommendations, and outcome. INTERVENTIONS: None. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The most common cause of trilostane exposure was ingestion of another dog's prescription (248/403 [61.5%]), followed by ingestion of extra or excessive dose(s) of the dog's own prescription (147/403 [36.5%]). Forty-one dogs (41/403 [10.2%]) had clinical signs attributable to trilostane exposure. Median onset of clinical signs after exposure was 2.5 h (range: 0.25-72 h). The most frequently reported clinical signs were vomiting (17/41 [41.5%]), lethargy (15/41 [36.6%]), and diarrhea (7/41 [17.0%]). Four cases (4/403 [0.99%]) were reported to require veterinary treatment for trilostane toxicosis. Of the cases with follow-up from the ASPCA (200/403 [49.6%]), most dogs (188/200 [93.5%]) developed no clinical signs from acute trilostane exposure. The median exposure dosage (13.2 mg/kg) in the 12 dogs that developed clinical signs was significantly higher than in those that did not (3.3 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that dogs ingesting a single, unintended dose of trilostane are likely to experience mild, self-limiting signs. The need for extensive hospitalization or aggressive medical care is unlikely, even with high single doses that exceed the published and Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic dosage.

Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
MSPCA-Angell (US), American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.