Plasma 5-Fluorouracil Exposure, Clinical Outcomes, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Background/Objectives: Body-surface-area-based dosing of continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil does not account for inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. This pilot study explored whether patient-level representative plasma 5-fluorouracil exposure within the target area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) range was associated with clinical outcomes. It evaluated a prototype immunochromatographic assay as a preliminary monitoring tool. Methods: Fifteen patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who received continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy were prospectively evaluated between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2018. Plasma 5-fluorouracil levels were measured during eight treatment cycles at three time points in each cycle. Representative AUC values were calculated using median concentrations across cycles and interpreted as exploratory patient-level exposure indices. Tumor response, grade ≥2 adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed descriptively. Results: The median representative AUC was 24.3 mg·h/L. Eight patients (53.3%) were within the target range of 20–30 mg·h/L, whereas seven (46.7%) were outside it. Disease control was observed in 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) within the target range and in 3 of 7 patients (42.9%) outside it. Grade ≥2 adverse events were less frequent in the target-range group (2/8, 25.0%) than in the outside-range group (6/7, 85.7%; p = 0.041). Progression-free survival was numerically longer in the target-range group (17.2 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.36), while overall survival did not differ clearly (p = 0.76); these survival analyses were exploratory. The prototype immunochromatographic assay showed a favorable correlation with the My-5FU assay (R2 = 0.762), but Bland–Altman analysis showed relatively wide limits of agreement. Conclusions: Target plasma 5-fluorouracil exposure was associated with lower clinically relevant toxicity and may support favorable tumor control in this pilot cohort. The prototype immunochromatographic method demonstrated preliminary feasibility for rapid plasma 5-FU monitoring but requires further validation before routine dose adjustment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101673
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma 5-Fluorouracil Exposure, Clinical Outcomes, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Naoki Sakuyama, Futoshi Shibasaki, Kiichi Nagayasu, Takumi Ochiai et al.
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Plasma 5-Fluorouracil Exposure, Clinical Outcomes, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Naoki Sakuyama, Futoshi Shibasaki, Kiichi Nagayasu, Takumi Ochiai, Yu Abe
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Body-surface-area-based dosing of continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil does not account for inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. This pilot study explored whether patient-level representative plasma 5-fluorouracil exposure within the target area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) range was associated with clinical outcomes. It evaluated a prototype immunochromatographic assay as a preliminary monitoring tool. Methods: Fifteen patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who received continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy were prospectively evaluated between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2018. Plasma 5-fluorouracil levels were measured during eight treatment cycles at three time points in each cycle. Representative AUC values were calculated using median concentrations across cycles and interpreted as exploratory patient-level exposure indices. Tumor response, grade ≥2 adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed descriptively. Results: The median representative AUC was 24.3 mg·h/L. Eight patients (53.3%) were within the target range of 20–30 mg·h/L, whereas seven (46.7%) were outside it. Disease control was observed in 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) within the target range and in 3 of 7 patients (42.9%) outside it. Grade ≥2 adverse events were less frequent in the target-range group (2/8, 25.0%) than in the outside-range group (6/7, 85.7%; p = 0.041). Progression-free survival was numerically longer in the target-range group (17.2 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.36), while overall survival did not differ clearly (p = 0.76); these survival analyses were exploratory. The prototype immunochromatographic assay showed a favorable correlation with the My-5FU assay (R2 = 0.762), but Bland–Altman analysis showed relatively wide limits of agreement. Conclusions: Target plasma 5-fluorouracil exposure was associated with lower clinically relevant toxicity and may support favorable tumor control in this pilot cohort. The prototype immunochromatographic method demonstrated preliminary feasibility for rapid plasma 5-FU monitoring but requires further validation before routine dose adjustment.

CancersVol. 18(10)
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (JP), Misato Junshin General Hospital (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.