Multifocal contact lenses for preoperative simulation of enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses using adaptive optics

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether multifocal contact lenses (CLs) can serve as preoperative simulators of postoperative vision with enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs), using the SimVis Gekko™ adaptive-optics visual simulator. METHODS: Twenty-four presbyopic subjects (mean age 54.9 ± 5.0 years; range 46-63) underwent monocular simulation of two daily disposable multifocal CLs (1-Day Acuvue® Moist Multifocal, medium addition; and Biotrue® ONEday for Presbyopia, high addition) and two IOLs (Tecnis® Eyhance™, enhanced monofocal; and LuxSmart™, EDOF) using the SimVis Gekko™ under photopic conditions and a fixed 3 mm pupil aperture. Monocular defocus curves were obtained from -3.00 to +1.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Area under the curve (AUC), negative-defocus cutoff at the 0.2 logMAR threshold, and defocus slopes from linear mixed-effects models were compared across lens conditions for both raw and offset corrected datasets. RESULTS: Both CLs exhibited a systematic -0.50 D myopic offset relative to the IOL simulations, consistent with their center-near design. After applying a +0.50 D vergence correction, AUC values were comparable across all four designs (p = 0.18). At the 0.2 logMAR threshold, LuxSmart showed the widest functional range (cutoff -2.38 ± 0.66 D) and Biotrue the narrowest (-1.69 ± 0.53 D). Mixed-effects modeling indicated equivalent defocus slopes between 1-Day Acuvue Moist and Tecnis Eyhance after vergence alignment (p = 0.894), while LuxSmart showed greater defocus tolerance and Biotrue degraded significantly faster (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Once the intrinsic -0.50 D myopic offset is compensated, the 1-Day Acuvue Moist Multifocal closely replicates the through-focus visual performance of the Tecnis Eyhance IOL, supporting its use as a practical preoperative simulator for patients being considered for enhanced monofocal implantation. Multifocal CLs combined with adaptive optics simulation may assist surgeons in tailoring IOL selection and improve shared decision-making before cataract surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2026.102665
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multifocal contact lenses for preoperative simulation of enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses using adaptive optics

Nuria Garzón, Inas Baoud Ould Haddi, Luca Giacopinelli, Silvia Carrasco-Rojo et al.
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Multifocal contact lenses for preoperative simulation of enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses using adaptive optics

Nuria Garzón, Inas Baoud Ould Haddi, Luca Giacopinelli, Silvia Carrasco-Rojo, César Albarrán-Diego, María García-Montero
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether multifocal contact lenses (CLs) can serve as preoperative simulators of postoperative vision with enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs), using the SimVis Gekko™ adaptive-optics visual simulator. METHODS: Twenty-four presbyopic subjects (mean age 54.9 ± 5.0 years; range 46-63) underwent monocular simulation of two daily disposable multifocal CLs (1-Day Acuvue® Moist Multifocal, medium addition; and Biotrue® ONEday for Presbyopia, high addition) and two IOLs (Tecnis® Eyhance™, enhanced monofocal; and LuxSmart™, EDOF) using the SimVis Gekko™ under photopic conditions and a fixed 3 mm pupil aperture. Monocular defocus curves were obtained from -3.00 to +1.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Area under the curve (AUC), negative-defocus cutoff at the 0.2 logMAR threshold, and defocus slopes from linear mixed-effects models were compared across lens conditions for both raw and offset corrected datasets. RESULTS: Both CLs exhibited a systematic -0.50 D myopic offset relative to the IOL simulations, consistent with their center-near design. After applying a +0.50 D vergence correction, AUC values were comparable across all four designs (p = 0.18). At the 0.2 logMAR threshold, LuxSmart showed the widest functional range (cutoff -2.38 ± 0.66 D) and Biotrue the narrowest (-1.69 ± 0.53 D). Mixed-effects modeling indicated equivalent defocus slopes between 1-Day Acuvue Moist and Tecnis Eyhance after vergence alignment (p = 0.894), while LuxSmart showed greater defocus tolerance and Biotrue degraded significantly faster (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Once the intrinsic -0.50 D myopic offset is compensated, the 1-Day Acuvue Moist Multifocal closely replicates the through-focus visual performance of the Tecnis Eyhance IOL, supporting its use as a practical preoperative simulator for patients being considered for enhanced monofocal implantation. Multifocal CLs combined with adaptive optics simulation may assist surgeons in tailoring IOL selection and improve shared decision-making before cataract surgery.

Contact Lens and Anterior EyeVol. 49(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universitat de València (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.