What’s next for HealthTech accelerators? The case for co-design

HealthTech accelerators are increasingly prominent initiatives for supporting the growth of early-stage innovations in MedTech, Digital Health and BioTech. These targeted 3–12 month programmes guide projects through regulatory, commercial, design and funding challenges to bring innovations to market. Despite the expansion of HealthTech accelerators over the past 10 years, their study is limited compared with accelerators in other fields, such as FinTech or EdTech. Involving the active collaboration of end users and wider stakeholders throughout the design process, co-design has been shown to improve HealthTech equity, safety, feasibility and likelihood of adoption. However, HealthTech accelerators rarely provide training and support for projects to use co-design frameworks, methods and mindsets. We argue that embedding more co-design practices into HealthTech accelerators is needed to ensure innovations are equitable and more likely to meet genuine user needs on a sustainable basis. Furthermore, such practices have the potential to speak to challenges identified in HealthTech accelerator studies, such as project difficulties with generating evidence for regulatory requirements and navigating tensions in professional identities. We acknowledge the logistical challenges of introducing co-design into fast-paced accelerator environments, including varying cohort maturity and skill sets. Drawing on emerging insights from the King’s MedTech Accelerator, we advocate, first, for a tailored approach to co-design training and support and, second, for further research to explore the value of co-design in maximising the impact of HealthTech innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Innovations
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2026-001553
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s next for HealthTech accelerators? The case for co-design

Emelia Delaney, Siobhan O’Connor, L Rose, Annie Howitt Sprent et al.
BMJ Innovations
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

What’s next for HealthTech accelerators? The case for co-design

Emelia Delaney, Siobhan O’Connor, L Rose, Annie Howitt Sprent, Wei Liu, Lili Golmohammadi, Glenn Robert, Sebastien Ourselin
article en

Abstract

HealthTech accelerators are increasingly prominent initiatives for supporting the growth of early-stage innovations in MedTech, Digital Health and BioTech. These targeted 3–12 month programmes guide projects through regulatory, commercial, design and funding challenges to bring innovations to market. Despite the expansion of HealthTech accelerators over the past 10 years, their study is limited compared with accelerators in other fields, such as FinTech or EdTech. Involving the active collaboration of end users and wider stakeholders throughout the design process, co-design has been shown to improve HealthTech equity, safety, feasibility and likelihood of adoption. However, HealthTech accelerators rarely provide training and support for projects to use co-design frameworks, methods and mindsets. We argue that embedding more co-design practices into HealthTech accelerators is needed to ensure innovations are equitable and more likely to meet genuine user needs on a sustainable basis. Furthermore, such practices have the potential to speak to challenges identified in HealthTech accelerator studies, such as project difficulties with generating evidence for regulatory requirements and navigating tensions in professional identities. We acknowledge the logistical challenges of introducing co-design into fast-paced accelerator environments, including varying cohort maturity and skill sets. Drawing on emerging insights from the King’s MedTech Accelerator, we advocate, first, for a tailored approach to co-design training and support and, second, for further research to explore the value of co-design in maximising the impact of HealthTech innovations.

BMJ Innovations
King's College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.