Resolving the paradox of local warning signal diversity: A framework for hypothesis testing

Abstract Defended prey often evolve conspicuous colorations that advertise their unprofitability to predators. These visual advertisements act as honest warning signals that predators can use to avoid these prey through associative learning. Müller's pioneering idea aptly explains the often‐observed signal convergence among unprofitable prey (i.e., Müllerian mimicry) as the result of positive frequency‐dependent selection. We therefore expect aposematic prey, at least those targeted by the same predators, to be homogeneous in signal appearance at local scales. Yet, it is common to observe diverse warning signals coexisting within communities. The simultaneous occurrence of warning signal convergence and diversity at local scales represents a stark contrast with theoretical expectations and has long stood as a paradox. Despite much interest in this phenomenon, there has not been an article that summarizes possible resolutions of the paradox and, more importantly, offers an empirical framework for hypothesis testing. We aim to fill these knowledge gaps by summarizing possible resolutions to this paradox, including (1) relaxed predation, (2) microhabitat segregation, (3) source–sink dynamics, (4) retentive predators, (5) immigration boost, (6) immigration rescue and (7) imminent signal extinction. We also propose a hierarchical hypothesis‐testing framework leveraging data from population surveys, genetic analyses and field learning experiments to elucidate the plausibility and contribution of these mechanisms. Our proposed framework would help resolve this long‐standing paradox in natural communities. By applying this framework to communities harbouring diverse warning signals and differing in their ecological environments, we can test hypotheses regarding how local warning signal diversity is being maintained at larger scales, and how ecology might have shaped the nature of resolutions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70356
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving the paradox of local warning signal diversity: A framework for hypothesis testing

Shu‐Ping Tseng, Chi‐Yun Kuo
Functional Ecology
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Resolving the paradox of local warning signal diversity: A framework for hypothesis testing

Shu‐Ping Tseng, Chi‐Yun Kuo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Defended prey often evolve conspicuous colorations that advertise their unprofitability to predators. These visual advertisements act as honest warning signals that predators can use to avoid these prey through associative learning. Müller's pioneering idea aptly explains the often‐observed signal convergence among unprofitable prey (i.e., Müllerian mimicry) as the result of positive frequency‐dependent selection. We therefore expect aposematic prey, at least those targeted by the same predators, to be homogeneous in signal appearance at local scales. Yet, it is common to observe diverse warning signals coexisting within communities. The simultaneous occurrence of warning signal convergence and diversity at local scales represents a stark contrast with theoretical expectations and has long stood as a paradox. Despite much interest in this phenomenon, there has not been an article that summarizes possible resolutions of the paradox and, more importantly, offers an empirical framework for hypothesis testing. We aim to fill these knowledge gaps by summarizing possible resolutions to this paradox, including (1) relaxed predation, (2) microhabitat segregation, (3) source–sink dynamics, (4) retentive predators, (5) immigration boost, (6) immigration rescue and (7) imminent signal extinction. We also propose a hierarchical hypothesis‐testing framework leveraging data from population surveys, genetic analyses and field learning experiments to elucidate the plausibility and contribution of these mechanisms. Our proposed framework would help resolve this long‐standing paradox in natural communities. By applying this framework to communities harbouring diverse warning signals and differing in their ecological environments, we can test hypotheses regarding how local warning signal diversity is being maintained at larger scales, and how ecology might have shaped the nature of resolutions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional Ecology
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), National Taiwan University (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.