Bridging technology and pedagogy: a cross-sectional analysis of AI use, self-reported academic effects, and ethical concerns among students across diverse health science curricula

Abstract Background Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a transformative force in health professions education, yet its impact on academic success and students' ethical concerns remains underexplored. This study evaluates AI utilization patterns and their perceived effects on learning outcomes among health science students. Methods Using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling design, data were collected from 310 students across various health-related programs via interviewer-administered questionnaires. Results Participants reported moderate familiarity with AI (mean knowledge score 3.08 ± 1.06). While 90% (n = 279) of students used ChatGPT, a significant training gap persists: 82.6% of respondents received no formal instruction on AI. AI usage frequency was significantly associated with higher GPAs (ANOVA, F = 15.56). Ethical concerns were prevalent (61%), with significant variance by gender (p = 0.0015) and academic program (p = 0.0114). Conclusion AI tools significantly enhance perceived study efficiency and comprehension of complex topics. However, disparities in formal training and significant ethical concerns necessitate the integration of a structured curriculum. Implications for Practice: Faculty should implement "proactive" AI training that addresses automation bias and ethical literacy to ensure equitable technological competency across healthcare disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10645-5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging technology and pedagogy: a cross-sectional analysis of AI use, self-reported academic effects, and ethical concerns among students across diverse health science curricula

Ibrahim Awad Eljack Ibrahim, Abubakar Mohammed Jibo, Dalal Mohammed Alhuian, Abdullah M. Alshahrani et al.
7 links
BMC Medical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Bridging technology and pedagogy: a cross-sectional analysis of AI use, self-reported academic effects, and ethical concerns among students across diverse health science curricula

Ibrahim Awad Eljack Ibrahim, Abubakar Mohammed Jibo, Dalal Mohammed Alhuian, Abdullah M. Alshahrani, Ghada Ayed Mohammed Alqarni, Ayidh Faleh Alshahrani, Khalid Hassan S Alshahrani, M. A. S. Alghamdi, S. H. Alharthi, A. M. Almarhabi, M. T. M. Almuawi, K. H. S. Alshahrani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a transformative force in health professions education, yet its impact on academic success and students' ethical concerns remains underexplored. This study evaluates AI utilization patterns and their perceived effects on learning outcomes among health science students. Methods Using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling design, data were collected from 310 students across various health-related programs via interviewer-administered questionnaires. Results Participants reported moderate familiarity with AI (mean knowledge score 3.08 ± 1.06). While 90% (n = 279) of students used ChatGPT, a significant training gap persists: 82.6% of respondents received no formal instruction on AI. AI usage frequency was significantly associated with higher GPAs (ANOVA, F = 15.56). Ethical concerns were prevalent (61%), with significant variance by gender (p = 0.0015) and academic program (p = 0.0114). Conclusion AI tools significantly enhance perceived study efficiency and comprehension of complex topics. However, disparities in formal training and significant ethical concerns necessitate the integration of a structured curriculum. Implications for Practice: Faculty should implement "proactive" AI training that addresses automation bias and ethical literacy to ensure equitable technological competency across healthcare disciplines.

BMC Medical Education
University of Bisha (SA)
University of Bisha
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon