Benefits and harms of copyright restrictions and conditions on burnout and other psychometric assessment scales

INTRODUCTION: Copyright conditions can hinder the scientific and usage impact of essential assessment tools in healthcare, organizational psychology, and other fields. The stories of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) are well-documented. Despite decades-old recommendations to blend copyright restrictions of intellectual property when used for commercial purposes with permissive but distinct copyright terms for non-commercial and scholarly use, few authors of assessment tools do so. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether restrictive copyrights limit the long-term scientific impact of copyright holders (often medical schools/faculty), by inhibiting downstream use, research, and improvement of measurement tools by other researchers. METHODS: We compared MEDLINE citation trends of two restrictive surveys (requiring royalty payments, prohibiting item modifications) - the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) - against four free-to-use and adapt surveys. Our outcome was the annual, theme-relevant citation ratio of each survey since publication. The ratio was the number of publications featuring the scale name in the title or abstract divided by total publications addressing the original theme (purpose) of the scale. We performed paired comparisons of the most recent slopes of the annual citation ratio, pairing each restrictive scale with a permissive scale, totaling eight comparisons. RESULTS: The restrictive MBI and MMSE initially showed rising slopes of annual citation ratios, and a decline in later years with negative slopes. Further, the final slope segments for all four permissive surveys were positive, vs. negative for the restrictive surveys, the slope difference being statistically significant for six out of eight comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive copyright conditions on assessment scales risk undermining their long-term scientific and functional relevance. Previously recommended blended copyright approaches can facilitate survey creators' revenues via commercial use royalties, while sustaining continued scholarly development and noncommercial usage to improve long-term relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350023
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefits and harms of copyright restrictions and conditions on burnout and other psychometric assessment scales

Sudha Xirasagar, Robert G. Badgett, Hayrettin Okut
PLoS ONE
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
article

Benefits and harms of copyright restrictions and conditions on burnout and other psychometric assessment scales

Sudha Xirasagar, Robert G. Badgett, Hayrettin Okut
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Copyright conditions can hinder the scientific and usage impact of essential assessment tools in healthcare, organizational psychology, and other fields. The stories of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) are well-documented. Despite decades-old recommendations to blend copyright restrictions of intellectual property when used for commercial purposes with permissive but distinct copyright terms for non-commercial and scholarly use, few authors of assessment tools do so. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether restrictive copyrights limit the long-term scientific impact of copyright holders (often medical schools/faculty), by inhibiting downstream use, research, and improvement of measurement tools by other researchers. METHODS: We compared MEDLINE citation trends of two restrictive surveys (requiring royalty payments, prohibiting item modifications) - the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) - against four free-to-use and adapt surveys. Our outcome was the annual, theme-relevant citation ratio of each survey since publication. The ratio was the number of publications featuring the scale name in the title or abstract divided by total publications addressing the original theme (purpose) of the scale. We performed paired comparisons of the most recent slopes of the annual citation ratio, pairing each restrictive scale with a permissive scale, totaling eight comparisons. RESULTS: The restrictive MBI and MMSE initially showed rising slopes of annual citation ratios, and a decline in later years with negative slopes. Further, the final slope segments for all four permissive surveys were positive, vs. negative for the restrictive surveys, the slope difference being statistically significant for six out of eight comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive copyright conditions on assessment scales risk undermining their long-term scientific and functional relevance. Previously recommended blended copyright approaches can facilitate survey creators' revenues via commercial use royalties, while sustaining continued scholarly development and noncommercial usage to improve long-term relevance.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Wichita State University (US), PRN of Kansas (US), Department of Health Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.