AJNR Study-Specific Guidelines for AI in Medical Imaging: Bridging Gaps in Reference Standard and Clinical Evaluation

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in neuroradiology can lead to heterogeneous study design and reporting that impede reproducibility and clinical translation. To support authors submitting AI imaging research to AJNR, we introduce six study-type-specific reporting checklists for studies focused on: (1) Classification and Clinical Outcome Prediction, (2) Lesion Detection and Segmentation, (3) Image Transformation (quality enhancement or cross-modality synthesis), (4) Clinical AI Tool Evaluation, (5) Radiology Workflow Optimization, and (6) Technical Developments/Miscellaneous. Drawing on collective experience from manuscript reviews and real-world deployments, we have identified common pitfalls and gaps that these checklists address. In this technical note, we summarize the key elements of each checklist. This initiative complements existing AI reporting guidelines, emphasizing rigorous reference standards and clinical relevance to bridge the gap between algorithm development and radiology practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9426
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AJNR Study-Specific Guidelines for AI in Medical Imaging: Bridging Gaps in Reference Standard and Clinical Evaluation

Nancy Pham, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Henk van Voorst, Seyedmehdi Payabvash et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AJNR Study-Specific Guidelines for AI in Medical Imaging: Bridging Gaps in Reference Standard and Clinical Evaluation

Nancy Pham, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Henk van Voorst, Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Reza Forghani, Gloria J Guzman Perez-Carrillo, Janet Mei, Greg Zaharchuk, Max Wintermark
article en

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in neuroradiology can lead to heterogeneous study design and reporting that impede reproducibility and clinical translation. To support authors submitting AI imaging research to AJNR, we introduce six study-type-specific reporting checklists for studies focused on: (1) Classification and Clinical Outcome Prediction, (2) Lesion Detection and Segmentation, (3) Image Transformation (quality enhancement or cross-modality synthesis), (4) Clinical AI Tool Evaluation, (5) Radiology Workflow Optimization, and (6) Technical Developments/Miscellaneous. Drawing on collective experience from manuscript reviews and real-world deployments, we have identified common pitfalls and gaps that these checklists address. In this technical note, we summarize the key elements of each checklist. This initiative complements existing AI reporting guidelines, emphasizing rigorous reference standards and clinical relevance to bridge the gap between algorithm development and radiology practice.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Johns Hopkins University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AJNR Study-Specific Guidelines for AI in Medical Imaging: Bridging Gaps in Reference Standard and Clinical Evaluation — Nancy Pham, Andreas M. Rauschecker, et al. · American Journal of Neuroradiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS