Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, and healthcare utilization, among patients with cancer (lung, breast, and pancreas) and cardiovascular diseases (HF, AF, hypertensive, and chronic ischemic heart disease) in Germany: two systematic review

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) (e.g., lockdowns and contact restrictions) disrupted routine healthcare delivery. In Germany, these measures affected diagnostic and treatment services for people with cancer and cardiovascular diseases, potentially delaying diagnosis and adversely influencing outcomes. We assessed whether and to what extent diagnosis, health utilization and health outcome among patients with selected cancer and cardiovascular conditions changed in Germany during the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted two systematic reviews of studies from Germany on selected cancers (breast, lung and pancreatic) and cardiovascular conditions (atrial fibrillation/flutter, heart failure, hypertensive and chronic ischemic heart disease). Protocols were registered in PROSPERO and the reviews were reported in accordance with PRISMA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase and screened grey literature. Outcomes included changes in new diagnoses, healthcare utilization, treatment, and disease-specific mortality during the pandemic (2020-2023) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using an adapted ROBINS-E tool. Owing to heterogeneity, we synthesized findings narratively. RESULTS: We screened 1991 records for cancer and 4,981 records for cardiovascular diseases, and included 9 cancer studies and 10 cardiovascular studies. For cancer, several studies reported a relative reduction in new breast and lung cancer diagnoses of up to 25% during lockdown periods; hospital admissions decreased by up to 9%. For cardiovascular conditions, hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation/flutter and heart failure decreased by up to 20%, particularly during pandemic peaks. Evidence on treatment delays, changes in treatment, and mortality was limited, and outcomes for other included diagnoses were often not reported. DISCUSSION: The available evidence indicates substantial reductions in hospital admissions and new diagnoses among patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease in Germany during the pandemic, suggesting major disruptions to care delivery. However, heterogeneity and gaps in the evidence base limit a comprehensive assessment of downstream outcomes. More comprehensive, linked data and further research are needed to quantify the full pandemic's impact and to strengthen health-system resilience for future crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Reviews
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03192-z
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, and healthcare utilization, among patients with cancer (lung, breast, and pancreas) and cardiovascular diseases (HF, AF, hypertensive, and chronic ischemic heart disease) in Germany: two systematic review

Berit Lange, Dörthe Meyerdierks, Maren Steinmann, Adil Imran et al.
Systematic Reviews
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, and healthcare utilization, among patients with cancer (lung, breast, and pancreas) and cardiovascular diseases (HF, AF, hypertensive, and chronic ischemic heart disease) in Germany: two systematic review

Berit Lange, Dörthe Meyerdierks, Maren Steinmann, Adil Imran, Torben Heinsohn, Manuela Harries, Alexander Kuhlmann, Maren Dreier, Carolina J. Klett-Tammen, Janine Ropeter, Beate Jahn, Nina Overhageböck
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) (e.g., lockdowns and contact restrictions) disrupted routine healthcare delivery. In Germany, these measures affected diagnostic and treatment services for people with cancer and cardiovascular diseases, potentially delaying diagnosis and adversely influencing outcomes. We assessed whether and to what extent diagnosis, health utilization and health outcome among patients with selected cancer and cardiovascular conditions changed in Germany during the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted two systematic reviews of studies from Germany on selected cancers (breast, lung and pancreatic) and cardiovascular conditions (atrial fibrillation/flutter, heart failure, hypertensive and chronic ischemic heart disease). Protocols were registered in PROSPERO and the reviews were reported in accordance with PRISMA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase and screened grey literature. Outcomes included changes in new diagnoses, healthcare utilization, treatment, and disease-specific mortality during the pandemic (2020-2023) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using an adapted ROBINS-E tool. Owing to heterogeneity, we synthesized findings narratively. RESULTS: We screened 1991 records for cancer and 4,981 records for cardiovascular diseases, and included 9 cancer studies and 10 cardiovascular studies. For cancer, several studies reported a relative reduction in new breast and lung cancer diagnoses of up to 25% during lockdown periods; hospital admissions decreased by up to 9%. For cardiovascular conditions, hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation/flutter and heart failure decreased by up to 20%, particularly during pandemic peaks. Evidence on treatment delays, changes in treatment, and mortality was limited, and outcomes for other included diagnoses were often not reported. DISCUSSION: The available evidence indicates substantial reductions in hospital admissions and new diagnoses among patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease in Germany during the pandemic, suggesting major disruptions to care delivery. However, heterogeneity and gaps in the evidence base limit a comprehensive assessment of downstream outcomes. More comprehensive, linked data and further research are needed to quantify the full pandemic's impact and to strengthen health-system resilience for future crises.

Systematic ReviewsVol. 15(1)
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik (AT), German Center for Infection Research (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.