Comparative study of time- and frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography for breast cancer detection

A multifrequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system was evaluated for its ability to detect conductive inclusions simulating carcinomas in breast phantoms, with a comparative analysis of time-difference and frequency-difference reconstruction approaches. The proposed EIT V5 system employs two concentric rings of 16 electrodes to acquire surface voltage measurements at multiple excitation frequencies (50 kHz, 500 kHz, and 1 MHz). Image reconstruction was performed using the Linear Back Projection (LBP) algorithm, and system performance was quantitatively assessed through spatial overlap metrics (intersection over union, IoU, and F1-score), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and confusion-matrix-derived metrics (sensitivity, specificity, and precision). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was also computed as a pixel-level, threshold-independent separability metric. Experimental phantoms were designed to approximate breast tissue composition, consisting primarily of adipose material with embedded conductive inclusions representing tumors. The results show that frequency-difference EIT consistently outperforms time-difference reconstruction across all evaluated scenarios, achieving higher CNR values (> 2.4) and improved spatial agreement (IoU and F1-score), while time-difference reconstructions exhibit significant variability and reduced contrast at lower frequencies. Although high AUC values (> 0.99) are observed for the frequency-difference approach, these should be interpreted as indicators of conductivity separability within individual reconstructions rather than diagnostic performance. Reconstructions obtained from the lower electrode ring demonstrate increased sensitivity, highlighting the influence of electrode geometry and inclusion proximity on detection performance. Importantly, frequency-difference reconstructions enhance contrast between conductive inclusions and surrounding tissue without requiring a prior baseline measurement. These findings indicate that multifrequency, frequency-difference EIT provides a robust and reliable approach for detecting conductive anomalies in controlled phantom conditions, reducing reconstruction artifacts and improving tissue discrimination. The proposed methodology shows strong potential as an auxiliary tool for early breast cancer detection, intracranial hemorrhage monitoring, and the development of wearable biomedical imaging systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae7117
Primary Topic
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of time- and frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography for breast cancer detection

M. López, Alejandro Ayala, Lorenzo García, José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi et al.
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
article

Comparative study of time- and frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography for breast cancer detection

M. López, Alejandro Ayala, Lorenzo García, José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi, Javier Alejandro Rodriguez Herrejon, Enrique Reyes Archundia, Wuqiang Yang
article en

Abstract

A multifrequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system was evaluated for its ability to detect conductive inclusions simulating carcinomas in breast phantoms, with a comparative analysis of time-difference and frequency-difference reconstruction approaches. The proposed EIT V5 system employs two concentric rings of 16 electrodes to acquire surface voltage measurements at multiple excitation frequencies (50 kHz, 500 kHz, and 1 MHz). Image reconstruction was performed using the Linear Back Projection (LBP) algorithm, and system performance was quantitatively assessed through spatial overlap metrics (intersection over union, IoU, and F1-score), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and confusion-matrix-derived metrics (sensitivity, specificity, and precision). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was also computed as a pixel-level, threshold-independent separability metric. Experimental phantoms were designed to approximate breast tissue composition, consisting primarily of adipose material with embedded conductive inclusions representing tumors. The results show that frequency-difference EIT consistently outperforms time-difference reconstruction across all evaluated scenarios, achieving higher CNR values (> 2.4) and improved spatial agreement (IoU and F1-score), while time-difference reconstructions exhibit significant variability and reduced contrast at lower frequencies. Although high AUC values (> 0.99) are observed for the frequency-difference approach, these should be interpreted as indicators of conductivity separability within individual reconstructions rather than diagnostic performance. Reconstructions obtained from the lower electrode ring demonstrate increased sensitivity, highlighting the influence of electrode geometry and inclusion proximity on detection performance. Importantly, frequency-difference reconstructions enhance contrast between conductive inclusions and surrounding tissue without requiring a prior baseline measurement. These findings indicate that multifrequency, frequency-difference EIT provides a robust and reliable approach for detecting conductive anomalies in controlled phantom conditions, reducing reconstruction artifacts and improving tissue discrimination. The proposed methodology shows strong potential as an auxiliary tool for early breast cancer detection, intracranial hemorrhage monitoring, and the development of wearable biomedical imaging systems.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
University of Manchester (GB), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX), Instituto Tecnológico de Morelia (MX)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.