Cardiac systole is associated with enhanced go responding in an orthogonalized go/nogo task

Action selection is traditionally thought to be governed by dual top-down control systems: a fast, affect-dependent controller and a slow, experience-driven controller. Emerging evidence indicates that bottom-up cardiac phase signals also contribute to action selection by facilitating (i.e., go) or suppressing (i.e., nogo) motor responses. Despite growing interest in cardiac-brain interactions, no prior study has examined whether cardiac phase effects on feedback-driven action decisions are modulated by appetitive and aversive motivational states. We conducted a secondary analysis of a go/nogo functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset (n = 29), retrospectively determining the onset of decision cues relative to physiologically defined cardiac phases. We tested competing behavioural and computational hypotheses proposing that cardiac phase modulated action selection via motivational action biases, or through a general, affect-independent prepotent urge to act. Additionally, we performed an exploratory fMRI analysis to investigate neural activity underlying action decisions as a function of cardiac phase. Converging behavioural and computational evidence showed that systole was associated with a higher likelihood of go responding, independent of motivational action biases. Preliminary fMRI results further suggested that systolic facilitation of action was accompanied by diminished neural activity supporting action inhibition. Together, these findings extend existing evidence that cardiac phase impacts action decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52930-9
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac systole is associated with enhanced go responding in an orthogonalized go/nogo task

Filippo Queirazza, Marios G. Philiastides, Joana Carvalheiro
Scientific Reports
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Cardiac systole is associated with enhanced go responding in an orthogonalized go/nogo task

Filippo Queirazza, Marios G. Philiastides, Joana Carvalheiro
article en

Abstract

Action selection is traditionally thought to be governed by dual top-down control systems: a fast, affect-dependent controller and a slow, experience-driven controller. Emerging evidence indicates that bottom-up cardiac phase signals also contribute to action selection by facilitating (i.e., go) or suppressing (i.e., nogo) motor responses. Despite growing interest in cardiac-brain interactions, no prior study has examined whether cardiac phase effects on feedback-driven action decisions are modulated by appetitive and aversive motivational states. We conducted a secondary analysis of a go/nogo functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset (n = 29), retrospectively determining the onset of decision cues relative to physiologically defined cardiac phases. We tested competing behavioural and computational hypotheses proposing that cardiac phase modulated action selection via motivational action biases, or through a general, affect-independent prepotent urge to act. Additionally, we performed an exploratory fMRI analysis to investigate neural activity underlying action decisions as a function of cardiac phase. Converging behavioural and computational evidence showed that systole was associated with a higher likelihood of go responding, independent of motivational action biases. Preliminary fMRI results further suggested that systolic facilitation of action was accompanied by diminished neural activity supporting action inhibition. Together, these findings extend existing evidence that cardiac phase impacts action decisions.

Scientific Reports
University of Glasgow (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, European Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.