Machine Learning Classification of Pacemaker Low-Longevity Status Using Device Interrogation Reports

Pacemaker generator replacement remains clinically important because battery depletion influences the timing of elective replacement procedures and associated procedural risk. This study investigated whether routinely available pacemaker interrogation-derived telemetry can classify devices with manufacturer-estimated low longevity status, defined as remaining device life below 12 months. A total of 39 Medtronic pacemaker interrogation snapshots were analyzed, including 11 single-chamber, 21 dual-chamber, and 7 triple-chamber CRT-P devices. Four machine learning classifiers, namely, Naïve Bayes, HistGradientBoosting, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation as the primary internal validation strategy, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals calculated from aggregated out-of-fold predictions. The study is application-based rather than algorithmic, focusing on transparent comparison and interpretation of established classifiers for pacemaker-specific low-longevity classification. Logistic Regression achieved the strongest LOOCV performance, with ROC-AUC 0.941, accuracy 0.872, precision 0.958, recall 0.852, and F1-score 0.902. Random Forest also showed favorable performance, with ROC-AUC 0.855 and F1-score 0.873. Parsimonious baseline analysis showed that months since implantation plus battery voltage achieved ROC-AUC 0.883, accuracy 0.846, and F1-score 0.875, approaching the full Logistic Regression model. SHAP analysis identified months since implantation, battery voltage, and right ventricular capture threshold as the most influential predictors. These findings suggest that routine interrogation variables can classify manufacturer-estimated low-longevity status, but the incremental benefit of full multivariable machine learning over simple predictors was modest. Because the endpoint was based on manufacturer-estimated longevity rather than observed clinical battery failure or generator replacement timing, larger longitudinal and multi-manufacturer validation studies are needed before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105134
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Classification of Pacemaker Low-Longevity Status Using Device Interrogation Reports

Samikshya Neupane, Tarun Goswami
Applied Sciences
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Machine Learning Classification of Pacemaker Low-Longevity Status Using Device Interrogation Reports

Samikshya Neupane, Tarun Goswami
article en

Abstract

Pacemaker generator replacement remains clinically important because battery depletion influences the timing of elective replacement procedures and associated procedural risk. This study investigated whether routinely available pacemaker interrogation-derived telemetry can classify devices with manufacturer-estimated low longevity status, defined as remaining device life below 12 months. A total of 39 Medtronic pacemaker interrogation snapshots were analyzed, including 11 single-chamber, 21 dual-chamber, and 7 triple-chamber CRT-P devices. Four machine learning classifiers, namely, Naïve Bayes, HistGradientBoosting, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation as the primary internal validation strategy, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals calculated from aggregated out-of-fold predictions. The study is application-based rather than algorithmic, focusing on transparent comparison and interpretation of established classifiers for pacemaker-specific low-longevity classification. Logistic Regression achieved the strongest LOOCV performance, with ROC-AUC 0.941, accuracy 0.872, precision 0.958, recall 0.852, and F1-score 0.902. Random Forest also showed favorable performance, with ROC-AUC 0.855 and F1-score 0.873. Parsimonious baseline analysis showed that months since implantation plus battery voltage achieved ROC-AUC 0.883, accuracy 0.846, and F1-score 0.875, approaching the full Logistic Regression model. SHAP analysis identified months since implantation, battery voltage, and right ventricular capture threshold as the most influential predictors. These findings suggest that routine interrogation variables can classify manufacturer-estimated low-longevity status, but the incremental benefit of full multivariable machine learning over simple predictors was modest. Because the endpoint was based on manufacturer-estimated longevity rather than observed clinical battery failure or generator replacement timing, larger longitudinal and multi-manufacturer validation studies are needed before clinical application.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(10)
Wright State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.