Psychological Literacy and Professional Competencies of Teachers

The primary aim of the study was to examine the relationships between components of psychological literacy – defined as the ability to apply psychological knowledge and principles in personal, social and professional contexts – and components of professional competencies in in-service teachers. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted with Slovak teachers ( N = 595 and N = 180), assessing psychological literacy (including psychological misconceptions, critical thinking dispositions, trust in science and ethical integrity) and self-perceived professional competencies (didactic competencies, teaching styles and interaction styles). Study 1 assessed misconceptions as knowledge accuracy, whereas Study 2 measured the degree to which teachers endorsed common psychological and educational beliefs. Across both studies, critical thinking dispositions – particularly critical openness and reflective scepticism – showed the most consistent associations with professional competencies. Psychological misconceptions were generally weakly and inconsistently related to professional competencies, although some learning myths demonstrated positive associations with several teaching practices. Trust in science and integrity showed a selective relationship with professional competencies. Overall, the findings suggest that dispositional aspects of psychological literacy, especially critical thinking, may be more strongly related to teachers’ professional self-perceptions than knowledge-based indicators alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Learning & Teaching
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257261452075
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Literacy and Professional Competencies of Teachers

Lucia Rapsová, Eva Ballová Mikušková
Psychology Learning & Teaching
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Psychological Literacy and Professional Competencies of Teachers

Lucia Rapsová, Eva Ballová Mikušková
article en

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to examine the relationships between components of psychological literacy – defined as the ability to apply psychological knowledge and principles in personal, social and professional contexts – and components of professional competencies in in-service teachers. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted with Slovak teachers ( N = 595 and N = 180), assessing psychological literacy (including psychological misconceptions, critical thinking dispositions, trust in science and ethical integrity) and self-perceived professional competencies (didactic competencies, teaching styles and interaction styles). Study 1 assessed misconceptions as knowledge accuracy, whereas Study 2 measured the degree to which teachers endorsed common psychological and educational beliefs. Across both studies, critical thinking dispositions – particularly critical openness and reflective scepticism – showed the most consistent associations with professional competencies. Psychological misconceptions were generally weakly and inconsistently related to professional competencies, although some learning myths demonstrated positive associations with several teaching practices. Trust in science and integrity showed a selective relationship with professional competencies. Overall, the findings suggest that dispositional aspects of psychological literacy, especially critical thinking, may be more strongly related to teachers’ professional self-perceptions than knowledge-based indicators alone.

Psychology Learning & Teaching
Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (SK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.