Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Monitor Inspiratory Muscle Effort and Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation

OBJECTIVE: Current methods for estimating inspiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) during mechanical ventilation are either invasive or dependent on occlusion maneuvers. A noninvasive artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm estimating in real-time the amplitude and timing of Pmus, enabling continuous monitoring of patient effort, driving pressure, and synchrony with the ventilator was designed, and its performance was evaluated against the gold standard obtained with esophageal manometry (Pmus,es). DESIGN: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Two ICUs from the University of São Paulo, Brazil. PATIENTS: Adult patients under pressure support ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pmus estimated using AI (Pmus,AI) was compared with Pmus,es and to values derived from occlusion maneuvers, the pressure muscle index and the occlusion pressure (Pocc). Automatic detection of dyssynchronies based on Pmus,AI was compared with experts' classification. A total of 48 participants with 4918 cycles were analyzed. Pmus,es varied from 1.0 to 28.4 cm H2O. Pmus,AI showed a bias of 0.9 cm H2O, 95% limits of agreement -5.1, 6.9 cm H2O and detected extreme values of both Pmus,es and dynamic driving pressure with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve greater than 0.8. Pmus,AI accuracy was comparable to occlusion-based techniques. Sensitivity and specificity to detect ineffective effort, autotriggering or reverse triggering were 86.5% and 77.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AI presented good performance in detecting high and low Pmus, and allowed the automatic detection of specific types of dyssynchronies. This novel noninvasive method was comparable to intermittent techniques requiring occlusion maneuvers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007145
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Monitor Inspiratory Muscle Effort and Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation

Glauco Plens, Yu Xia, ELIAS BAEDORF KASSIS, C ntia Carvalho et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Monitor Inspiratory Muscle Effort and Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation

Glauco Plens, Yu Xia, ELIAS BAEDORF KASSIS, C ntia Carvalho, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Caio C. A. Morais, Thaís Gregol, G C Alcala, Paula Breda Colpani, Éder Pacheco, Ewan C. Goligher, Laurent Brochard, Ana Carolina dos Santos, Eduardo Leite Vieira Costa, Luiz Marcelo Malbouisson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current methods for estimating inspiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) during mechanical ventilation are either invasive or dependent on occlusion maneuvers. A noninvasive artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm estimating in real-time the amplitude and timing of Pmus, enabling continuous monitoring of patient effort, driving pressure, and synchrony with the ventilator was designed, and its performance was evaluated against the gold standard obtained with esophageal manometry (Pmus,es). DESIGN: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Two ICUs from the University of São Paulo, Brazil. PATIENTS: Adult patients under pressure support ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pmus estimated using AI (Pmus,AI) was compared with Pmus,es and to values derived from occlusion maneuvers, the pressure muscle index and the occlusion pressure (Pocc). Automatic detection of dyssynchronies based on Pmus,AI was compared with experts' classification. A total of 48 participants with 4918 cycles were analyzed. Pmus,es varied from 1.0 to 28.4 cm H2O. Pmus,AI showed a bias of 0.9 cm H2O, 95% limits of agreement -5.1, 6.9 cm H2O and detected extreme values of both Pmus,es and dynamic driving pressure with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve greater than 0.8. Pmus,AI accuracy was comparable to occlusion-based techniques. Sensitivity and specificity to detect ineffective effort, autotriggering or reverse triggering were 86.5% and 77.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AI presented good performance in detecting high and low Pmus, and allowed the automatic detection of specific types of dyssynchronies. This novel noninvasive method was comparable to intermittent techniques requiring occlusion maneuvers.

Critical Care Medicine
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University Health Network (CA), Harvard University (US), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto General Hospital (CA), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR), Toronto General Hospital Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.