Remaining dentine thickness following post space preparation in maxillary and mandibular molars: a micro–computed tomography study

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different post space drill diameters on remaining dentine thickness in maxillary and mandibular molars using high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Sixty molars (30 maxillary, 30 mandibular) with straight or slightly curved roots were allocated into homogeneous groups using pre-existing micro-CT datasets. Post spaces were prepared in the maxillary palatal and mandibular distal roots using Inod drills of three diameters (1.14, 1.25, and 1.55 mm; n = 10 per group). By superimposing pre- and post-preparation scans, the remaining dentine thickness was measured at 1-mm intervals apically from the furcal level (FL) in multiple directions. Data were analysed using ANOVA and post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). Maxillary molars generally retained ≥ 1 mm of dentine thickness across most surfaces and drill sizes, with buccal walls remaining consistently thicker than palatal ones. Only a single perforation occurred (buccal aspect, 1.55 mm group). Conversely, mandibular molars exhibited significantly thinner mesial walls compared to distal walls (p < .05), frequently resulting in postoperative thicknesses of ≤ 1 mm on the mesial surfaces. Furthermore, three perforations occurred on the mesial aspect with the 1.55 mm drill, whereas the distal walls generally maintained ≥ 1 mm thickness without perforations. Drill diameter significantly influences remaining dentine thickness in molar roots. The anatomical dimensions of palatal roots in maxillary molars permit post space preparation with a low risk of perforation, even with larger drills. However, highly conservative preparation or evidence-based post-free alternatives, such as endocrowns, are strongly recommended for mandibular molars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Odontology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01414-3
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remaining dentine thickness following post space preparation in maxillary and mandibular molars: a micro–computed tomography study

Cangül Keskin, Amine Yiğit, Ali Keleş
Odontology
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Remaining dentine thickness following post space preparation in maxillary and mandibular molars: a micro–computed tomography study

Cangül Keskin, Amine Yiğit, Ali Keleş
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different post space drill diameters on remaining dentine thickness in maxillary and mandibular molars using high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Sixty molars (30 maxillary, 30 mandibular) with straight or slightly curved roots were allocated into homogeneous groups using pre-existing micro-CT datasets. Post spaces were prepared in the maxillary palatal and mandibular distal roots using Inod drills of three diameters (1.14, 1.25, and 1.55 mm; n = 10 per group). By superimposing pre- and post-preparation scans, the remaining dentine thickness was measured at 1-mm intervals apically from the furcal level (FL) in multiple directions. Data were analysed using ANOVA and post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). Maxillary molars generally retained ≥ 1 mm of dentine thickness across most surfaces and drill sizes, with buccal walls remaining consistently thicker than palatal ones. Only a single perforation occurred (buccal aspect, 1.55 mm group). Conversely, mandibular molars exhibited significantly thinner mesial walls compared to distal walls (p < .05), frequently resulting in postoperative thicknesses of ≤ 1 mm on the mesial surfaces. Furthermore, three perforations occurred on the mesial aspect with the 1.55 mm drill, whereas the distal walls generally maintained ≥ 1 mm thickness without perforations. Drill diameter significantly influences remaining dentine thickness in molar roots. The anatomical dimensions of palatal roots in maxillary molars permit post space preparation with a low risk of perforation, even with larger drills. However, highly conservative preparation or evidence-based post-free alternatives, such as endocrowns, are strongly recommended for mandibular molars.

Odontology
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Remaining dentine thickness following post space preparation in maxillary and mandibular molars: a micro–computed tomography study — Cangül Keskin, Amine Yiğit, et al. · Odontology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS