Secondary Uranium Mineral Assemblages in Carboniferous Paleokarst Infill, Um Bogma Formation, the Southern Tethyan Margin: Implications for the Arabian–Nubian Shield in Mineralogical Characterization and Supergene Enrichment

The Lower Carboniferous Um Bogma Formation in southwestern Sinai has sixteen paleokarst structures at Allouga, Abu Thor, and Abu Zarab. Each structure contains high uranium concentrations. These occur in a lateritic infill sequence formed along the southern Tethyan margin. Radiometric reconnaissance in this sector of the Arabian–Nubian Shield has been ongoing for decades. However, the mineralogical character of assemblages in the region was never systematically documented. This study uses multiple techniques to characterize both radioactive and non-radioactive mineral assemblages from paleokarst-fill materials at all sites. Geochemical analysis was used to clarify uranium fixation and ore genesis. Nine radioactive minerals were identified: carnotite, autunite, torbernite, uranophane, uranothorite, thorite, chalcophanite, natroboltwoodite, and soddyite. Eight nonradioactive accessory phases were also found: zircon, monazite, malachite, atacamite, jarosite, rutile, arsenopyrite, and paratacamite. Geochemical data indicate that iron oxide surface adsorption is the dominant mechanism of uranium fixation. A strong positive correlation between uranium and Fe2O3 (r = 0.98), together with negative correlations with carbonate-associated elements (CaO, MgO, Na2O), supports this interpretation. Therefore, uranium is classified as a supergene, low-grade ore. It is concentrated during laterite maturation in paleokarst cavities. Its distribution is governed by ferruginous siltstone lithofacies, not the enclosing carbonate host. These findings offer a reference paragenetic framework for secondary uranium metallogenesis in Carboniferous carbonate terrains of the Arabian–Nubian Shield. They also provide a mineralogical template for exploration in similar paleokarst-hosted systems across the Arabian Platform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050558
Primary Topic
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Secondary Uranium Mineral Assemblages in Carboniferous Paleokarst Infill, Um Bogma Formation, the Southern Tethyan Margin: Implications for the Arabian–Nubian Shield in Mineralogical Characterization and Supergene Enrichment

Mohamed H. Helal, Haitham M. Ayyad, Osama Ramzy Elshahat, Mohamed Mohamed Fahim Abaza et al.
Minerals
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
article

Secondary Uranium Mineral Assemblages in Carboniferous Paleokarst Infill, Um Bogma Formation, the Southern Tethyan Margin: Implications for the Arabian–Nubian Shield in Mineralogical Characterization and Supergene Enrichment

Mohamed H. Helal, Haitham M. Ayyad, Osama Ramzy Elshahat, Mohamed Mohamed Fahim Abaza, Mohamed W. Abd El-Moghny, Mahmoud Mohamed Mohamed Ali Gabr, Mohamed Fathy
article en

Abstract

The Lower Carboniferous Um Bogma Formation in southwestern Sinai has sixteen paleokarst structures at Allouga, Abu Thor, and Abu Zarab. Each structure contains high uranium concentrations. These occur in a lateritic infill sequence formed along the southern Tethyan margin. Radiometric reconnaissance in this sector of the Arabian–Nubian Shield has been ongoing for decades. However, the mineralogical character of assemblages in the region was never systematically documented. This study uses multiple techniques to characterize both radioactive and non-radioactive mineral assemblages from paleokarst-fill materials at all sites. Geochemical analysis was used to clarify uranium fixation and ore genesis. Nine radioactive minerals were identified: carnotite, autunite, torbernite, uranophane, uranothorite, thorite, chalcophanite, natroboltwoodite, and soddyite. Eight nonradioactive accessory phases were also found: zircon, monazite, malachite, atacamite, jarosite, rutile, arsenopyrite, and paratacamite. Geochemical data indicate that iron oxide surface adsorption is the dominant mechanism of uranium fixation. A strong positive correlation between uranium and Fe2O3 (r = 0.98), together with negative correlations with carbonate-associated elements (CaO, MgO, Na2O), supports this interpretation. Therefore, uranium is classified as a supergene, low-grade ore. It is concentrated during laterite maturation in paleokarst cavities. Its distribution is governed by ferruginous siltstone lithofacies, not the enclosing carbonate host. These findings offer a reference paragenetic framework for secondary uranium metallogenesis in Carboniferous carbonate terrains of the Arabian–Nubian Shield. They also provide a mineralogical template for exploration in similar paleokarst-hosted systems across the Arabian Platform.

MineralsVol. 16(5)
Northern Border University (SA), Al-Azhar University (EG), Nuclear Materials Authority (EG)
Northern Border University
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.