Developing a faceted classification of terms of use for research data

Purpose Many data providers use non-standardized and heterogeneous licenses. Using different terms for the same rights and covering various levels of detail and facets make data licensing complex and ambiguous. These issues make it difficult to create sound licensing terms and make licenses hard to understand. They might further undermine data owners' intellectual property rights and impede the full use of data. We address the problem by creating a knowledge organization system – a faceted classification – to represent and organize key data licensing information, thereby removing the barrier to data licensing and sharing. Design/methodology/approach We used grounded facet analysis, following the steps of facet analysis and using grounded theory to generate the facets and foci of the classification. We used a stratified, systematic sampling method to select licenses from 73 data repositories. Three rounds of iterative testing were conducted to ensure the reliability and validity of the product. We validated the final product by assessing its theoretical soundness and practical implementation. Findings We created terms of use faceted classification (TUFC) for research data. The study demonstrates that TUFC is an effective tool for representing domain knowledge in data licensing. Originality/value TUFC is a foundational knowledge organization system for data licensing. It breaks down complex licenses into facets and foci, providing a common language and structure to dissolve the issues caused by license heterogeneity. TUFC facilitates data providers to make sound Terms of Use for research data, helps users quickly understand data licenses and promote data reuse, and provides a formal scheme for research data license checking for data repositories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-11-2025-0337
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a faceted classification of terms of use for research data

Margaret E. I. Kipp, Li Yang, Jianyao Chen
Journal of Documentation
Research Data Management Practices
article

Developing a faceted classification of terms of use for research data

Margaret E. I. Kipp, Li Yang, Jianyao Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose Many data providers use non-standardized and heterogeneous licenses. Using different terms for the same rights and covering various levels of detail and facets make data licensing complex and ambiguous. These issues make it difficult to create sound licensing terms and make licenses hard to understand. They might further undermine data owners' intellectual property rights and impede the full use of data. We address the problem by creating a knowledge organization system – a faceted classification – to represent and organize key data licensing information, thereby removing the barrier to data licensing and sharing. Design/methodology/approach We used grounded facet analysis, following the steps of facet analysis and using grounded theory to generate the facets and foci of the classification. We used a stratified, systematic sampling method to select licenses from 73 data repositories. Three rounds of iterative testing were conducted to ensure the reliability and validity of the product. We validated the final product by assessing its theoretical soundness and practical implementation. Findings We created terms of use faceted classification (TUFC) for research data. The study demonstrates that TUFC is an effective tool for representing domain knowledge in data licensing. Originality/value TUFC is a foundational knowledge organization system for data licensing. It breaks down complex licenses into facets and foci, providing a common language and structure to dissolve the issues caused by license heterogeneity. TUFC facilitates data providers to make sound Terms of Use for research data, helps users quickly understand data licenses and promote data reuse, and provides a formal scheme for research data license checking for data repositories.

Journal of Documentation
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), University School of Milwaukee (US), Central China Normal University (CN), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.