Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy after curative-intent resection of cholangiocarcinoma (GeCiCCA): a multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III trial

Background: This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin improves overall survival compared to gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Secondary outcomes include assessment of disease-free survival, treatment safety, and adherence. Methods: This phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 80 patients with resected CCA, randomized to receive either gemcitabine plus cisplatin or gemcitabine monotherapy. Outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, and safety were assessed. Findings: At a median follow-up of 83.5 months (95% CI, 73.8–91.2), data were censored on 30 January 2025. A total of 45 deaths (56.3%) were documented. The median overall survival was 68.9 months in the gemcitabine–cisplatin group compared with 49.1 months in the gemcitabine group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.48–1.58; P = 0.655). Similarly, median DFS did not differ significantly between gemcitabine plus cisplatin (36.6 months) and gemcitabine alone (36.2 months) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.49–1.53; P = 0.625). Subgroup analyses showed non-significant trends favoring combination therapy in patients with intrahepatic tumors, lymph node-negative disease, and early-stage CCA. Treatment adherence was lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (62.5% vs. 92.5%). Grade 3–4 adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (77.5% vs. 70%), with higher rates of nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity observed. Interpretation: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin did not significantly improve OS or DFS compared to gemcitabine alone in resected CCA. Combination therapy was associated with higher toxicity and lower adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04637-4
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy after curative-intent resection of cholangiocarcinoma (GeCiCCA): a multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III trial

Vor Luvira, Tharatip Srisuk, Piyakarn Watcharenwong, Piti Ungarreevittaya et al.
2 links
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy after curative-intent resection of cholangiocarcinoma (GeCiCCA): a multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III trial

Vor Luvira, Tharatip Srisuk, Piyakarn Watcharenwong, Piti Ungarreevittaya, Julaluck Promsorn, Apiwat Jarearnrat, Aumkhae Sookprasert, Kosin Wirasorn, Thanachai Sanlung, Jarin Chindaprasirt, Chaiyut Charoentum, Chawalit Chayangsu, Attapol Titapun, Dr. Watcharin Loilome (ดร. วัชรินทร์ ลอยลม), Kulyada Eurboonyanan
article en

Abstract

Background: This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin improves overall survival compared to gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Secondary outcomes include assessment of disease-free survival, treatment safety, and adherence. Methods: This phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 80 patients with resected CCA, randomized to receive either gemcitabine plus cisplatin or gemcitabine monotherapy. Outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, and safety were assessed. Findings: At a median follow-up of 83.5 months (95% CI, 73.8–91.2), data were censored on 30 January 2025. A total of 45 deaths (56.3%) were documented. The median overall survival was 68.9 months in the gemcitabine–cisplatin group compared with 49.1 months in the gemcitabine group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.48–1.58; P = 0.655). Similarly, median DFS did not differ significantly between gemcitabine plus cisplatin (36.6 months) and gemcitabine alone (36.2 months) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.49–1.53; P = 0.625). Subgroup analyses showed non-significant trends favoring combination therapy in patients with intrahepatic tumors, lymph node-negative disease, and early-stage CCA. Treatment adherence was lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (62.5% vs. 92.5%). Grade 3–4 adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (77.5% vs. 70%), with higher rates of nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity observed. Interpretation: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin did not significantly improve OS or DFS compared to gemcitabine alone in resected CCA. Combination therapy was associated with higher toxicity and lower adherence.

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Khon Kaen University (TH), Surin Hospital (TH), Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University (TH), Chiang Mai University (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon