Green Imperialism and the Paradox of Colonial Conservation: Forest Governance in Punjab (ca. 1860–1880)

Colonial forest policies in India combined conservation and exploitation, managing landscapes for protection while serving the interests of the empire. Focusing on the period from around 1860 until 1880, Punjab emerged as a key site for implementing and institutionalising these policies. This paper examines how colonial forest law and management practices reshaped Punjab’s ecological systems, highlighting the paradox of colonial conservation, where efforts to protect forests simultaneously facilitated resource extraction. The research explores how such interventions shaped customary rights, agrarian structures and social relations. The study utilises qualitative archival research, drawing on forestry reports, revenue records and administrative correspondence. The findings demonstrate that British forestry in Punjab prioritised revenue and infrastructure demands over ecological balance, transforming public lands into regulated state property and displacing local communities. The paper finds that colonial forestry in Punjab exemplifies ecological imperialism, resulting in long-term legacies of environmental degradation, social dispossession and institutionalised state control. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environment
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/whpge.63881453971832
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Imperialism and the Paradox of Colonial Conservation: Forest Governance in Punjab (ca. 1860–1880)

Deepak Malik, Tariq Ahmad Sheikh
Global Environment
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Green Imperialism and the Paradox of Colonial Conservation: Forest Governance in Punjab (ca. 1860–1880)

Deepak Malik, Tariq Ahmad Sheikh
article en

Abstract

Colonial forest policies in India combined conservation and exploitation, managing landscapes for protection while serving the interests of the empire. Focusing on the period from around 1860 until 1880, Punjab emerged as a key site for implementing and institutionalising these policies. This paper examines how colonial forest law and management practices reshaped Punjab’s ecological systems, highlighting the paradox of colonial conservation, where efforts to protect forests simultaneously facilitated resource extraction. The research explores how such interventions shaped customary rights, agrarian structures and social relations. The study utilises qualitative archival research, drawing on forestry reports, revenue records and administrative correspondence. The findings demonstrate that British forestry in Punjab prioritised revenue and infrastructure demands over ecological balance, transforming public lands into regulated state property and displacing local communities. The paper finds that colonial forestry in Punjab exemplifies ecological imperialism, resulting in long-term legacies of environmental degradation, social dispossession and institutionalised state control. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Global Environment
Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums (IN), Historical Archives (HU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.