Assessing the competitiveness of China's livestock industry from the perspective of technological progress

Purpose This paper discusses the production technology gap in China's livestock sector, a critical factor contributing to the sector's low competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach This paper refines the livestock yield calculation formula and employs it as the central variable. Using static and dynamic comparisons, we analyze the trends and development potential of China's livestock industry competitiveness from international and domestic perspectives. Findings The production technology level of China's livestock is generally low. After rapid progress initially, the rate of technological advancement has declined sharply since the beginning of the 21st century, resulting in a persistent gap between China and leading international producers. Furthermore, technological progress in pork and chicken production in the country has always lagged behind that in beef and mutton production. The beef cattle and meat sheep sectors are exhibiting faster “catch-up” growth, possibly because they started from a lower baseline, whereas the commercial pig and poultry sectors are experiencing diminishing marginal returns or a “growth bottleneck” typical of mature industries. Originality/value This study provides a simplified framework for assessing competitiveness through yield analysis and refines yield formulas for different livestock types. The findings have important practical implications for the sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Agricultural Economic Review
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-01-2025-0001
Primary Topic
Global Trade and Competitiveness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the competitiveness of China's livestock industry from the perspective of technological progress

Shuangyu Zheng, Li J, Jingchi Huang
China Agricultural Economic Review
Global Trade and Competitiveness
article

Assessing the competitiveness of China's livestock industry from the perspective of technological progress

Shuangyu Zheng, Li J, Jingchi Huang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper discusses the production technology gap in China's livestock sector, a critical factor contributing to the sector's low competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach This paper refines the livestock yield calculation formula and employs it as the central variable. Using static and dynamic comparisons, we analyze the trends and development potential of China's livestock industry competitiveness from international and domestic perspectives. Findings The production technology level of China's livestock is generally low. After rapid progress initially, the rate of technological advancement has declined sharply since the beginning of the 21st century, resulting in a persistent gap between China and leading international producers. Furthermore, technological progress in pork and chicken production in the country has always lagged behind that in beef and mutton production. The beef cattle and meat sheep sectors are exhibiting faster “catch-up” growth, possibly because they started from a lower baseline, whereas the commercial pig and poultry sectors are experiencing diminishing marginal returns or a “growth bottleneck” typical of mature industries. Originality/value This study provides a simplified framework for assessing competitiveness through yield analysis and refines yield formulas for different livestock types. The findings have important practical implications for the sector.

China Agricultural Economic Review
China Agricultural University (CN), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Trade and Competitiveness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.